Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-03

Rishabh Parekh <rishabhp@gmail.com> Mon, 07 October 2019 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rishabhp@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F941208CB; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNAIQw9IXIin; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com (mail-vs1-xe29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5F91208CD; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id p13so9577024vsr.4; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CMYOFlaAh/2vC8kOtP1vVQnhL5lCfW4q8/jclj/JDO8=; b=i4dl5GvAyO3Mt8pqV/h983CLwwYubBK3DnckcjcfjW7BMbA/7HXAdyyzBKOc2p0bp4 pXcvqJ421Q3e1T4KGtH9bZVzCRngXT0gI/2StJIywZbsJbYMmgEm0zK9WikwSbLXNFwg 63k2JMz/oleqNSEKl4x+w2iF9XomNi9fJUqq8KEQfU9x/XQn5RI6t4GukIYtqwMqFyoD F5cSo/bfSQINvoxi8qpSCpcbrotirReFSOYqBiAyWWXMyhPmyxijP3ZTCg18ozyvS0/L JBpQc3TfWwG5gM/XAkErFuBmHB9jfEpE114kGJcf6xr3jlldHwW9g+omul08/8IG2UAu cflA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CMYOFlaAh/2vC8kOtP1vVQnhL5lCfW4q8/jclj/JDO8=; b=VoXUQQvk+yXb4ujPc99ocKJDDZe79j6lCHQt9y+w+ISsiP9Kofn7RDxzD1j+aKfSCe 6ssECX0f7AA6ms4Dkd44YuSLGZnsJgL3dhN6VhhxzIfWEoF7sWqUfgYiVSczD00m3/2Q pfADjx9NKTzrhSA+oW/O/nyjnLECrUF/O1MYZgum/64aA21B0mZAs/BMI+wIBc2K3fBG FdgDHRRsi5h7tTL3qBsQYg+qkYMBp/ytFv+DqRvYfRe8bienaGIBQjZ0D4/kF3WbSTzD 2002xqqVeepbe+xiAX4/LHZdv38b4SaWwxQSttoNpxQPjRoN2ULyeRSx47tjj3P+nfIO C3LQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUXWshIHlHS4VkzaHSkWELEy4Po9k/9TttNUznlHkvEKtPSy2sK J90PDGBGiT6jeT4rqcOixqW7cChsB9U87/hxv1c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxZuPmgdGrEXWgqSQ5rW4rQZjtiaRAe5ovEMb6Wu8xmdy0Oh6QEib60wAScsGOyMaW3FFGKLJ2tx6K/S8h6m50=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:fc89:: with SMTP id x9mr16010453vsp.60.1570472822815; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F036AED4-5B24-4C45-A3B7-7C6F6A2B8DCA@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <F036AED4-5B24-4C45-A3B7-7C6F6A2B8DCA@nokia.com>
From: Rishabh Parekh <rishabhp@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:26:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABjMoXZKd+4oKjp9b9cobKyW2cvwh5_J3XuOodSb2R-1rVhUQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/qikqWTsPMP8MkjQ8drYBgs5CsMo>
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-03
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:27:07 -0000

I too support the progress of this document.

-Rishabh

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:49 AM Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
<matthew.bocci@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Folks
>
>
>
> I have only seen a few responses to this WG last call. I am therefore going to extend it until Friday 4th October.
>
>
>
> If you haven’t done so, please review the draft and post any comments to the list and indicate whether or not you support publication as a standards track RFC.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
> Date: Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 15:26
> To: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
> Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation@ietf.org>
> Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-03
>
>
>
> Hello Working Group,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two week Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-03 [1].
>
>
>
> This poll runs until 25 September 2019.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
>
>
>
> There are currently no IPR disclosures against the document.
>
>
>
> If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for any existing implementation as per [2].
>
>
>
>     Thank you,
>
>     Matthew and Stephane
>
>
>
>     [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation/
>
>     [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess