Re: [bess] IETF 117 BESS - IPv6 Only PE Design & IPv4 Only PE Design ALL SAFI Supported

Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 07 August 2023 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A00AC15256B; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 06:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R774CqfZ2y4N; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 06:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D494C1522BE; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 06:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-40feecefa84so17391941cf.1; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 06:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691415981; x=1692020781; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HtWX717XpsZakgkXcUCaR1cx2N1R/5ImZWB0ORWm8qU=; b=dIYEZOsqP8sbkNhZx6FHw2JC/gytRIWTgFSSpCXiBKPgcPyhO6Y7OnOD/jpyomcmRx XE4KqRx2sGrwbdm+SXCdez+e6W2yC+MHb1RmI/EdlkufGUooGUdIFMxxiGAhJEclIRZm uDq7uq+I9JsrfYTYtI9PWMF9AaeyjYYYFOKzdiW2G7vmyXkXJQT4ebQTU29DvZ3UNdhP rkygJtHNe75DBFbejyoa9wfjC3wlZ4Ns7/RkDjqzwv5etH0hiKuWmBe6yCl/2WlwOoaz ZX8RL2oOaSsB0y/oRrQjZCIenc24aWnpfgFG23xIufiNLb2R0ZUT7DO5e4RQFxRhCdrv glbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691415981; x=1692020781; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HtWX717XpsZakgkXcUCaR1cx2N1R/5ImZWB0ORWm8qU=; b=CYxaJ15oZjPKbpavlnzYSS/UptdV/3TZ8sKPFewpM/CDVGz1C4ykGIJldNPNpAVmzL IasXaDPH1h1o8u8kDM+OGp9QObY4QW+ULiADTZdHNl4QbGfNrTj9pkHS2MrH0DeeZOQX uefp6o57a0Y5zrJmATCfCwCl307e4q6ll0QR8lW1qjWmhWJzI/BIUHZvct+QZ8gULfjF epiv5O3ec6jEhTsPqsswTkxBEgknZG5o7KTxYNBn1XrkDrYnvnu+azYXNakqmTS1Vqtu 7ELYrQDNZ2tchS3+YdsMOqNy4/PzOq4SYmuxiVrmC4G9XBiP94tEO3JNmWPwZyQFTVpD EuLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwtpiHCoSP84ojYXLoCBJs/woOvUaZiBjcNcdP6mqBhvdF8Z/Av fIGsPrp8nJZCH9nVyK+4B5E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF8+VIwfun65mDE7MC00NQ9Rxhhw6l++anWDKuP+YgvqKE4PM1sFYp16avb/RzV3qa/mWY5Og==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4310:b0:767:b4c0:45a1 with SMTP id u16-20020a05620a431000b00767b4c045a1mr9723778qko.66.1691415980078; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 06:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2605:a601:91bc:d800:c119:c802:8bd9:eeee]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w23-20020a05620a149700b0076c72dad35dsm2587630qkj.63.2023.08.07.06.46.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Aug 2023 06:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <FF3B9A1B-6B12-410D-9DF9-546A741AC2CC@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FACA8F55-0016-4008-BD30-347E3B1A3CCE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 09:46:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <71A6C52F-4784-4779-AB3C-BF11C42111EB@gmail.com>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, BESS <bess@ietf.org>, bess-chairs@ietf.org, "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CABNhwV2fKc90vn2QJRZdZ4h81i+BFGXj6_UarQ10WKphfFFFRg@mail.gmail.com> <71A6C52F-4784-4779-AB3C-BF11C42111EB@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/tBTswrk6smxlENvQpsk7aEvMDBQ>
Subject: Re: [bess] IETF 117 BESS - IPv6 Only PE Design & IPv4 Only PE Design ALL SAFI Supported
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 13:46:26 -0000

I also support merger of the four documents with identification of common procedures. 

Thanks,
Acee

> On Aug 6, 2023, at 21:03, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> As co-author I support the merge of the documents proposed, please do provide any objections you might have.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jeff
> 
>> On Jul 27, 2023, at 17:32, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Dear BESS WG,
>> 
>> From my presentation today discussion on "merging" of drafts I  would like to poll the BESS WG on merging of the two drafts labeled #1 & #2 below into the WG document labeled #3 below:
>> Please respond  to this email.
>> 
>> Some history:
>> IPv6 Only PE design / ALL SAFI:
>> draft-ietf-bess-ipv6-only-pe-design-04 (BCP) (Original BCP testing draft with Cisco, Juniper, Nokia, Arista, Huawei) (WG document)
>> IPv6 Only PE design single IPv6 peer - testing SAFI 1,128,129 
>> draft-mishra-bess-ipv6-only-pe-design-all-safi-04 (Standards Track) (New Draft) - Extended Standards Track to support ALL IPv4 SAFI
>> 
>> IPv4 Only PE design / ALL SAFI:
>> The below drafts were two separate drafts but I have combined into single draft since they both were not WG documents
>> draft-mishra-bess-ipv4-only-pe-design-02 -(BCP) (POC testing draft with Cisco, Juniper, Nokia, Arista, Huawei)
>> IPv4 Only PE design single IPv4 peer - testing SAFI 1,128,129
>> draft-mishra-bess-ipv4-only-pe-design-all-safi-05 (Standards track) (New Draft) - Extended Standards Track to support ALL IPv4 SAFI (Both v4 drafts have been combined into this Draft early this year) 
>> (Introduces new IPv4 next hop encoding IANA capability codepoint standardization following RFC 8950 IPv4 next hop and not legacy IPv4 mapped IPv6 address next hop ::FFFF::1.1.1.1)
>> (Today there is a mix of IPv4 next hop and IPv4 mapped IPv6 next hop across all vendors and within same vendor platform -afi/safi matrix to be added to merged draft)
>> 
>> Combine these two drafts --> So now we are left with  these 2 new drafts that extend to support ALL SAFI
>> 
>> #1 draft-mishra-bess-ipv6-only-pe-design-all-safi-03 (Standards Track)
>> #2 draft-mishra-bess-ipv4-only-pe-design-all-safi-04 (Standard Track)
>> 
>> Into WG document below:
>> 
>> #3 draft-ietf-bess-ipv6-only-pe-design-04 (BCP)
>> 
>> And make the new combined draft "Standards Track" as it will have the operational process and procedure update for the alternative dual stacking method for all SAFI 
>> as well as New IANA capability code point for IPv4 next hop encoding similar to RFC 8950.  
>> 
>> NEW DRAFT NAME: 
>> 
>>  draft-ietf-bess-v4-v6-pe-all-safi (Standards Track)
>> 
>> Why combine?
>> Both IPv4 Only PE Design & IPv6 Only PE design are identical concepts of single IPv4 peer or single IPv6 peer carrying SAFI 1,128.129 for both v4 & v6 prefixes being POC tested - can now be done in parallel
>> Extensibility of both the IPv4 Only PE Design & IPv6 Only PE design extends to the same set of ALL IPv4 / IPv6 SAFI's
>> Saves both WG time on progressing 3 separate drafts
>> Single draft that has the entire v4 / v6 design & architecture in one spot versus being broken out into separate drafts added complexity
>> 
>> Thank you
>> 
>>  <http://www.verizon.com/>
>> Gyan Mishra
>> Network Solutions Architect 
>> Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>
>> M 301 502-1347
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BESS mailing list
>> BESS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess