Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27

["Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)" <[e-mail]>]

Sorry I wasn't aware that I had an action item here. Is the idea to move these attributes to TBD instead of NORMAL ? If so, should we do it as part of Rfc-Editor work or should I submit a new version of mux-attributes that does the changes .


Please advise


Thanks

Suhas

________________________________
From: Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 11:35 PM
To: Ben Campbell; Charles Eckel (eckelcu); Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
Cc: Adam Roach; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; The IESG; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27

Hi,

My understanding is that Suhas was going to update the mux-categories draft, to be aligned with 4583bis.

Regards,

Christer

From: Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>
Date: Thursday, 20 December 2018 at 5.53
To: Charles Eckel <[e-mail]>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27

I've probably lost track of the discussion somewhere; but it looks like 4583bis and mux-attributes still disagree on the mux-categories for confid, userid, and floorid. Was there a plan to change those in mux-attributes prior to publication?

Thanks,

Ben.


On Dec 18, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Ben,

Please have a look at this updated version and let us know if it addresses your DISCUSS.
Reviews by others and confirmation that this update addresses your comments would be appreciated as well.

Thanks,
Charles

From: bfcpbis <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Charles Eckel <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2018 at 8:00 AM
To: Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, Adam Roach <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, Mary Barnes <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, The IESG <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27

Thanks Christer. Here are the links to the corresponding draft. All the changes in it look good to me.

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt
has been successfully submitted by Christer Holmberg and posted to the
IETF repository.

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27

Cheers,
Charles

From: Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Saturday, December 8, 2018 at 7:42 AM
To: Charles Eckel <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, Adam Roach <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, Mary Barnes <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, The IESG <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Draft new version: rfc4583bis-27

Hi,

Based on the gen-art review, and the IESG reviews, I have submitted a new version (-27) of draft-rfc4583bis.

The new version implements the following merged pull request:

https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-bfcp-4583bis/pull/13

Thank You to everyone who provided comments!

Regards,

Christer