Re: [bfcpbis] New versions of rfc4582bis/rfc4583bis

I "asume" so ;)

I'll correct the typo locally and submit it in a later version.

-- Tom

On 04/30/2013 11:53 AM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
> (as an individual)
>
> Tom and Alan,
>
> Thank you both for the addition of the version handling text. The changes look good to me.
> One typo in section 7 of rfc4583-bis:
> s/ MUST assume/MUST assume
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>
>    
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org]
>> On Behalf Of Tom Kristensen (tomkrist)
>> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 3:09 PM
>> To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> Cc: 'Tom Kristensen'; Alan Ford
>> Subject: [bfcpbis] New versions of rfc4582bis/rfc4583bis
>>
>> The version negotiation mechanism in SDP and related version
>> handling text is added to the two drafts for rfc4582bis and rfc4583bis
>> as presented and discussed on this list earlier on.
>>
>> Thanks to Alan Ford for both initiating the discussion after interop
>> testing and to provide a solution (and actual text to merge into the
>> specifications).
>>
>>
>>     The drafts are available here:
>>       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
>>     ... and here:
>>       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
>>
>>     The diffs from the previous versions are available at:
>>       http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-09
>>     ... and at:
>>       http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-07
>>
>> With this the remaining issue is solved, and I do believe the drafts
>> are indeed ready for the final stages of the IETF process!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -- Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bfcpbis mailing list
>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>      