Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-25

Christer Holmberg <> Wed, 26 September 2018 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD1A130EBA for <>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.756
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00d4O3EF1Var for <>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D48130EAE for <>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256;; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt;; t=1537976542; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=989DsrUY1CFqZRtl4yBu90V44RTgcukl7e/4/2qUs+g=; b=BkpFZjEibMBlo1mSO/yL/v3dAvSGKbQBrdvPFxxpEqt/8zhV6DVAsg0M16om9eVY lPhUclsD9OyZ/cbNh/+tub15AWs6JCbfvPZRkwxpAo4PSWuGh3FsvhsB8p4/i7+Q TWJnjfJsuyO9DRphAElp4ksCcty20uT12g4pHaVrWo0=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-223ff700000055ff-48-5baba8de90be
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 35.40.22015.ED8ABAB5; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:42:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:42:22 +0200
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.003; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:42:22 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: Mary Barnes <>
CC: Charles Eckel <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Draft new version: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-25
Thread-Index: AQHUVYJoWFaXr+sEwk+fJc4Xwk38iqUC0zEA//+fPYCAAEGVbw==
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:42:22 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A535F503A49141B1A72712350F6F2F77ericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7qe69FaujDeY8s7L4t+4ok8XWGQfZ LDbN+sJm8Xn/fmYHFo8pvzeyeuycdZfdY8mSn0wBzFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGd9n3WYrOOZV ca/lN1MD4x6PLkYODgkBE4mfs+S7GLk4hASOMkqsujODFcL5xiixve0pO4SzjFHi8aP3zCAd bAIWEt3/tLsYOTlEBHQkvn1+ywZSwyywllHiz40XrCAJYQEHiQOXbzJCFDlKXLs3hRnCdpK4 emYPO4jNIqAqsefpByYQm1fAXmJd+3uoZdsZJT4c+gg2iFMgUOLWi3NgRYwCYhLfT60Bs5kF xCVuPZkPZksICEgs2XOeGcIWlXj5+B8ryKHMAskS/dcrIOYLSpyc+YRlAqPILCTdsxCqZiGp gghrSqzfpQ9RrSgxpfshO4StIdE6Zy47svgCRvZVjKLFqcXFuelGxnqpRZnJxcX5eXp5qSWb GIExd3DLb90djKtfOx5iFOBgVOLhZZm7OlqINbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCO+dKUAh3pTEyqrUovz4 otKc1OJDjNIcLErivHqr9kQJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZJk4OKUaGIW3BR+Nifpc7qns3rHe857u s+J9fCt1HKwend82wcDY6tn52r0lLjlsgju5GWPkt60pmmt16wC7xDv+2OplNQ5dufciX3Gw 3hBvYPXy5/otan6spPY/1zZ5rmvetlN/eC0RzJmzZ1Vo3Pt/c7ufV7j2/jLb6KJSe9ZySYpD 9DvZ4PI4DU0dJZbijERDLeai4kQATHsWO7UCAAA=
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Draft new version: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-25
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:42:27 -0000


I have no problem with a WGLC, but I don’t think we would get any additional reviewers.

But, in any case I agree that Paul should take a look.



Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Sep 2018, at 16.46, Mary Barnes <<>> wrote:

We definitely need Paul Kyzivat to review and ensure that he's okay with the changes, since he did the SDP directorate review.  Note, he mentioned  in a posting that he thought the changes warranted another last call and I don't recall seeing a response to that.   As shepherd, I kindof agree, although I'm okay as long as everyone that reviewed previously confirms on the list that they have reviewed the changes and think the doc is ready to go.


On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:34 AM Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <<>> wrote:
Thanks for submitting this updated version, Christer.
The changes are significant. I ask that everyone, not just Adam and those who commented on the changes, review the updated draft and share their confirmation of the changes and/or any remaining concerns.


-----Original Message-----
From: Christer Holmberg <<>>
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 12:19 PM
To: "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Subject: Draft new version: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-25
Resent-From: <<>>
Resent-To: Gonzalo Camarillo <<>>, <<>>, Christer Holmberg <<>>, Charles Eckel <<>>, Keith Drage <<>>, <<>>, Adam Roach <<>>, <<>>, Mary Barnes <<>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 12:19 PM


    I have submitted a new version (-25) of 4583bis.

    The new version contains the merged pull request that was created based on Adam's issues.