[bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Fri, 07 September 2012 14:06 UTC
Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B62F21E809E for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FhJ-xJbL6W71 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E591221E809B for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=898; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347026779; x=1348236379; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=jPtNiq6Rqidw48r7YL6Jj+0On80eYLtOukS9II+BPlg=; b=jG38o/NLJbpk/YEcLoZrGipVyDKWdj+xJp4XgQFsfXaDIOyVSG72wXnn wnjGZNJAkXhMTaRdHjDI87VxdtMj7/lR/qGG+4Ad80K9pkZb2E8y2Tuf4 uXrDVZ/fV4CPynAaNILCxtffXcCWbzRF5Ey6IEH7RG6Pfqft5PfSB4xl2 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYFAAv/SVCtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABFhUC1eoEHgiIBBBIBCh1RASoUQiYBBBsah24LmXCBKKBIkGZgA5ZxjSGBZ4Jk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,387,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="119321912"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2012 14:05:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q87E5wRD023870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:05:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.66]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:05:58 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
Thread-Index: Ac2NAebzBYClQBg9RDyoP1c4U2Sovw==
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:05:58 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882809B301@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.117.51]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19168.005
x-tm-as-result: No--28.314500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:06:19 -0000
(As WG co-chair) This is to announce a working group last call for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis, "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Format for Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) Streams". http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis/ This is intended as a Standards Track RFC, obsoleting RFC 4583. Please respond to the list by September 28th 2011 (i.e. 3 weeks) with any comments. It is helpful to attempt to categorize your comment (e.g. technical issue vs. editorial), and also to provide any replacement text you feel is necessary. If you review the document and have no comments, please tell the chairs that you have reviewed it. This is always useful information in assessing the degree of WG review and consensus behind the document. Note, another WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis will be run in parallel. Cheers, Charles
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis Charles Eckel (eckelcu)