[bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Fri, 07 September 2012 14:05 UTC
Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6403221E809B for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xHfEgfdiqF3 for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D40221E8051 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=846; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347026756; x=1348236356; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=GWKhwzvJzBqF9VjQ79Qo6GW/KsdltYPiL7OfiLCJJCQ=; b=JpRXdbjGdWnYoJI+g35ujeQ7YFDe37r5HgaRDFZn7wckzFBoEEA9F8Ay /jvqE87EFD62oWV17nlI2K+z7yK9DmEwwpu2LFh8Ms6C94W+0vaqFGGZq mzH7tLdK9EOJCyE0IK33WpwkdJ3y67r7c/qTlAUkXtD6aDzlkS3u1w3EK w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYFAAv/SVCtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABFhUC1eoEHgiIBBBIBCh1RASoUQiYBBBsah24LmXCBKKBIkGZgA5ZxjSGBZ4Jk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,387,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="119355760"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2012 14:05:56 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q87E5tJl006474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:05:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.66]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:05:55 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
Thread-Index: Ac2NAeUBlWZWMlJIRpyXKbtffhLaTQ==
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:05:54 +0000
Message-ID: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C0882809B2F9@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.117.51]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19168.005
x-tm-as-result: No--27.631700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bfcpbis>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:05:57 -0000
(As WG co-chair) This is to announce a working group last call for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis, "The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)". http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis/ This is intended as a Standards Track RFC, obsoleting RFC 4582. Please respond to the list by September 28th 2011 (i.e. 3 weeks) with any comments. It is helpful to attempt to categorize your comment (e.g. technical issue vs. editorial), and also to provide any replacement text you feel is necessary. If you review the document and have no comments, please tell the chairs that you have reviewed it. This is always useful information in assessing the degree of WG review and consensus behind the document. Note, another WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis will be run in parallel. Cheers, Charles
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Mary Barnes
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Horvath, Ernst
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Tom Kristensen
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Tom Kristensen
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Tom Kristensen
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582… Tom Kristensen