Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis

Actually, my proposal would be to move both the subsections under 6.2 
"Unreliable Transport", since the "NAT Traversal" and "Large 
Message..."/"Fragmentation Handling" is written in the UDP/BFCP context.

I also propose to collapse the section "Large Message..." and its 
subsection "Fragmentation Handling" into one, since the main thing here 
is to describe the fragmentation handling solution.

OK?

-- Tom

On 10/08/2012 08:09 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
> (as an individual)
>
> Hi Horvath,
>
> Sorry for the delay in responding. I agree that NAT traversal should not be a subsection of Large message considerations; however, I think it would be better to relocate it to section 6.2.3 as a part of Section 6.2 "Unreliable Transport".
>
>       6.2.  Unreliable Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>         6.2.1.  Congestion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>         6.2.2.  ICMP Error Handling  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>         6.2.3.  NAT Traversal  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>       6.3.  Large Message Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>         6.3.1.  Fragmentation Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>
>    
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Horvath, Ernst [mailto:ernst.horvath@siemens-enterprise.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:29 AM
>> To: Charles Eckel (eckelcu); bfcpbis@ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
>>
>>
>> Currently 6.3.2 "NAT Traversal" is a subsection of 6.3 "Large Message
>> Considerations". Is this really the intention, or should NAT Traversal better
>> be renumbered as section 6.4?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ernst
>>
>>      
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org
>>> [mailto:bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
>>> Sent: Samstag, 22. September 2012 02:36
>>> To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
>>>
>>> Just a gentle reminder that we are into the last week for
>>> comments. Please review the draft and submit your comments by
>>> the Sept 28th, 2012 deadline (not 2011 as erroneously typed
>>> previously)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Charles (as co-chair)
>>>
>>>        
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 7:06 AM
>>>> To: bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>>> Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis
>>>>
>>>> (As WG co-chair)
>>>>
>>>> This is to announce a working group last call for
>>>>          
>>> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-
>>>        
>>>> rfc4582bis, "The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)".
>>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis/
>>>>
>>>> This is intended as a Standards Track RFC, obsoleting RFC 4582.
>>>> Please respond to the list by September 28th 2011 (i.e. 3
>>>>          
>>> weeks) with any
>>>        
>>>> comments.
>>>>
>>>> It is helpful to attempt to categorize your comment (e.g.
>>>>          
>>> technical issue vs.
>>>        
>>>> editorial), and also  to provide any replacement text you
>>>>          
>>> feel is necessary.
>>>        
>>>> If you review the document and have no comments, please
>>>>          
>>> tell the chairs
>>>        
>>>> that you have reviewed it. This is always useful
>>>>          
>>> information in assessing the
>>>        
>>>> degree of WG review and consensus behind the document.
>>>> Note, another WGLC for draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis will
>>>>          
>>> be run in parallel.
>>>        
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Charles
>>>>          
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bfcpbis mailing list
>>> bfcpbis@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>>>
>>>        
> _______________________________________________
> bfcpbis mailing list
> bfcpbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis
>    