Re: [Bier] Current Slot requests summarized, further ones to this thread please ...

[Tony Przygienda <[e-mail]>]

cop:'ing stragglers into this thread for tracking purposes ;-)

> Toerless:

a) Discussion of draft-eckert-teas-bier-te-framework which
> is about the BIER-TE suggested control plane framework (IGP, PCEP mostly).
>
> This will also be presented at TEAS on monday morning, and
> i hope BIER participants interested in BIER-TE will show up there,
> but i hope i can focus the TEAS slot to get feedback how to go forward
> with TEAS organizzed work in PCE / LSR, so i probably would love
> to push back in TEAS discussing really technical details of BIER
> TE that relate to forwarding plane vs. control plane interactions or
> the like and redirect that to this BIER WG slot.
>
> I will include a quick update on draft-ietf-bier-te-arch, which really
> only added the Alia requested clarification of forwarding plane
> distinction between BIER/BIER-TE, but no other changes.
>
> b) Rachel already i think posted a request to
> present draft-huang-bier-te-encapsulation, i think it does not matter
> how you order that presentation re. the framework (before/after)
>
> c) I have not seen a request from Pascal, so i am asking for
> a slot for draft-thubert-bier-replication-elimination
> and will draft him to present, or worst case present on his behalf.
> this one i think should be directly after or before Rachels slot.
>

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Tony
>
>
>
> Also can we add, 10 min for draft-ietf-bier-pim-signaling, to give group
> an update.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Hooman
>
>
>
> *From:* BIER [mailto:[e-mail]] *On Behalf Of *Tony Przygienda
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 6, 2018 2:44 PM
> *To:* BIER WG <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* [Bier] Current Slot requests summarized, further ones to this
> thread please ...
>
>
>
> Slot requests so far, no particular order, please double-check, any
> further posts to this list, it's spread across multiple mailboxes/threads
> which is unnecessary
>
> - I’d like to have 10-15 minutes to present our new draft
> draft-huang-bier-te-encapsulation-00. This draft proposes an enhanced
> encapsulation to support BEIR, BIER-TE and a control word.
>  - draft-zzhang-algorithms, but focus on handling BIER incapable routers;
> 15 minutes
>  - draft-zzhang-bier-bar-ipa; 10 minutes
>  - BIER in RIFT (draft-zzhang-bier-rift); 10 minutes (after Sandy's
> presentation on draft-zwzw-bier-prefix-redistribute)
> - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-purkayastha-bier-multicast-http-00.txt. I
> will like to request a presentation slot of 10 to 15 minutes, during the
> London BIER WG session.
> -  I’d like to request a presentation slot of 15 to 20 minutes to discuss:
> MVPN using P2MP and BIER (draft-xie-bier-mvpn-mpls-p2mp)
> - draft-venaas-bier-mtud-00.txt: I would like to present this proposal. 15
> minutes would be good perhaps.
> - The Resilience for BIER draft-xiong-bier-resilience-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiong-bier-resilience/
>
> We're very popular this time it seems, slots will be short ...
>
> As general guideline: curtail your excitement for new encapsulations if
> possible, we only have in charter v6 native encaps & possibly something if
> it pertains to TE. I can imaging that having BIER tunneling drafts (if
> anything is necesary) are of interest but thinking we can re-encode BIER
> packets over Avian carriers is good for 1st of upcoming month but will be
> hard pressed to find adoption ...
>
> Otherwise there is enough control work to finish IDR, BGP-LS, help with
> Babel and so on ...
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> --- tony
>
>
>