IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] [babel] About bierin6 and signalling of encapsulation

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Fri, 17 November 2017 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52381273B1; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:34:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJ5JyVY3VdP9; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:34:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F408D127735; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:34:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z3so7230145wme.5; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:34:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CsQ/mLWbFaEq2TaKpKDBJXLpjMFAxR79IrCu7yhodVk=; b=hS5U0X8MRl25qGwFTe5RUkbRAOnw9UCu/8/vDyt4kpITkYabhK6fm9LvKu57T3rJqG RjFJxxPyO6R17KOwc1ysyyokVU53wMG+e0ruRIE4SXByF3GifZFB51h+MLsCLBgmKWgD jXvYIfexSYbwm87mwhwAhFrpFwiIvkrz96okhpUaZxYGx2fCOddw9vmiaNU27JkR82p7 J7zMECAGkbNfcjpzn3+A5mFnSGVdB39//bRmcAoZLKl3LkP9i+tUAeKBUtWa8v4I97mf psVPZGoi529oTc4Ok6gX6p3MaTwu3MFQe1QiZBh9nvPrY7CL7lDd3sW8ESm5WRaXv+T5 8W/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CsQ/mLWbFaEq2TaKpKDBJXLpjMFAxR79IrCu7yhodVk=; b=cfOri+FAnkCQOPzTO2ygFvWB8x7Q+DOxgtSXmp8/QcH5smVbzA7naDtUwJxzXcxTwF CMl1kanMnZGd8Fgr/ySARZ++IvPZhMxFCuQr3OaVp/+4dIKkLCKPX/b/hsjkGAnLUNMj g88FKXJm/eynvdfpFvn25wf2PJtjiJLZJiFJ0xCbp5iVSH24hq15oVVuRUVlXdkWNMcU u14xk1sv8garTEKrhrROaTNoGT/1rn+2qGm3R2qAxcKt2eYbMRQOWRB6LVY3H+/LX4Wm 2DWmeifePF7EJqQ7zMEscUwenMts5B4cr7lLn+1K6iOQUy0Ft190wxiXUpOyXVpWNyxl eqzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7XGmM89kdaxV8b9Jnz8X+U1Dr9+tD5/XU0bzSASgswZP3L6sj9 0jNYxCsSPtb+9U0gXZIAYTkSxBb7sIqcVaP4x1o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYTj9KkYChacHydaXqoyuueeJfQ+yLhO7Iv25NUxXSGeH7W8NRzm6skQPf/uxeNxj73Ut8PWbvCUwadl/CGP7U=
X-Received: by 10.80.226.74 with SMTP id o10mr8047135edl.290.1510932841568; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:34:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.164.199 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 07:33:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87zi7lp51s.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <7imv3m4724.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CA+wi2hMdf5+coMdEL79vtYhGtT9g8Wv0DCTR25mxALPoWj-0QA@mail.gmail.com> <CY1PR07MB263424813C6E420834EB55498E2F0@CY1PR07MB2634.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <87zi7lp51s.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:33:19 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMqJT041QDS_oLt9OL+Rxfuv3XMOg-ptjMJvFRyb94EhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Zhang Z <zzhang_ietf@hotmail.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043e165c4d1d87055e2f77c1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/AooWVK286Xpz-eyViA1g31Lrr9M>
Subject: Re: [Bier] [babel] About bierin6 and signalling of encapsulation
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:34:19 -0000

either encapsulation can be picked and with that migration is trivial ...

Again, architecture doesn't spell that out but if SD/SI/BML match you can
use any encaps to reach the neighbor


--- tony

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:

> > In fact there's consensus in one bier domain.
>
> I'm not sure I'm happy with that.  For one, it means that you cannot
> migrate a domain incrementally.
>
> -- Juliusz
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email