Re: [Bier] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt

Xiejingrong <xiejingrong@huawei.com> Fri, 20 October 2017 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAE2124F57 for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wESKFdR5rbuo for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A161320D8 for <bier@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DYD00344; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:20:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 10:20:17 +0100
Received: from NKGEML514-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::40a8:f0d:c0f3:2ca5]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:20:05 +0800
From: Xiejingrong <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
To: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt
Thread-Index: AdNJhHPts1TTbb4CT1+k6zvc/YnSyw==
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:20:04 +0000
Message-ID: <16253F7987E4F346823E305D08F9115A951BF570@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.217.214]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.59E9BFD2.007D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 69e3adecdc6c24b5e1575bc6c2d314a2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/FcF_SPWZN-tHiFQgJ7tyszAExAQ>
Subject: Re: [Bier] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:20:23 -0000

HI, all:

About draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt, 
In chap 2.1, BIER Sub-TLV is defined as a sub-tlv of the Extended Prefix TLV (defined in RFC7684).
In chap 2.2, The BIER MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV.
In chap 2.3, The BIER Tree Type Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV.
In chap 2.4, The BIER sub-domain BSL conversion Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV.  
In chap 4, The document requests three new allocations from the OSPF Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry as defined in [RFC7684].

Should the allocation for 3 Sub-TLVs of the BIER Sub-TLV be from some registry, other than the OSPF Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry?