IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 20 October 2017 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075A6132D17; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsQh8YNSXFEl; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AFC21330B3; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1560; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508500680; x=1509710280; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bfq+zkBvSCBG8R+NYpkFStrF1XI1cFGriEu4BjDNv84=; b=S/ZJNNbaaQBdXMCImYBBIjL9040CtuOnXLTkipeThSfNsge2JUkG3mBN QKIVKTENpRp0MSBl+r0Mwldoig1nuOWVtxLTIfeuYf/JgzihwD589UyMw F9U3nBwef66F7PanwAk/qnaOFLG0mz8RTm8JuKXoCYRz5KSwrf7cZUpbj Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ChAADV4+lZ/49dJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg19kbicHg3OKH48/mC+CEQoYC4UYAhqEHz8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFHgIEAQEhEToLEAIBCBoCJgICAiULFRABAQQBDQWKIBCpVYIniyEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPgh+CB4M5gyqFBYMUgmEFoVwClG+THJVJAhEZAYE4AR84gVt6FUmCZIRfdolHgREBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,405,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="308312505"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Oct 2017 11:57:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9KBvxcm024731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:57:59 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:57:58 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:57:58 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Xiejingrong <xiejingrong@huawei.com>, "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
CC: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt
Thread-Index: AdNJhHPts1TTbb4CT1+k6zvc/YnSywAFirAA
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:57:58 +0000
Message-ID: <D60F5C0B.D0BA7%acee@cisco.com>
References: <16253F7987E4F346823E305D08F9115A951BF570@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <16253F7987E4F346823E305D08F9115A951BF570@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <645ABC393208F244A4E925031988718B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/p_y9iIeGm_MyFf2ntgIvczznRRw>
Subject: Re: [Bier] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:58:02 -0000

Hi Xiejing, (+OSPF List),

On 10/20/17, 5:20 AM, "BIER on behalf of Xiejingrong"
<bier-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of xiejingrong@huawei.com> wrote:

>HI, all:
>
>About draft-ietf-bier-ospf-bier-extensions-08.txt,
>In chap 2.1, BIER Sub-TLV is defined as a sub-tlv of the Extended Prefix
>TLV (defined in RFC7684).
>In chap 2.2, The BIER MPLS Encapsulation Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER
>Sub-TLV.
>In chap 2.3, The BIER Tree Type Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of the BIER Sub-TLV.
>In chap 2.4, The BIER sub-domain BSL conversion Sub-TLV is a Sub-TLV of
>the BIER Sub-TLV. 
>In chap 4, The document requests three new allocations from the OSPF
>Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry as defined in [RFC7684].
>
>Should the allocation for 3 Sub-TLVs of the BIER Sub-TLV be from some
>registry, other than the OSPF Extended Prefix sub-TLV registry?

No. With 64K Sub-TLV types, it is not likely that we will run out any time
soon and some of the Sub-TLVs apply to multiple TLVs.

Thanks,
Acee 
>_______________________________________________
>BIER mailing list
>BIER@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email