Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC04D3A0C67; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zjh-twM5Jt_G; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A003A0C65; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id f5so4186438ilq.5; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UgiIgc/wLsKz+aw2vOvLXueYR5Ax1T2sZwEOYAPP99o=; b=lNc6AoFnt8NrnF4yMcvXG7TIfn7ApfCbu0u9MiG5uuljoARes8cfVAmdljC4wVbi2B XHOhpnmL5XqaO6IQF4E51euT/M0kOzvmkdwFmVK+mMhHohHeIvRgQnV74TbtFFWsytnP GWittMViq9JtoWFh31Qn+xtnM+JEx/85qsWqTVCtKHnMa/zmwE/Ir0Uee2ENXkNGyEO1 M6jDLPoFDxMxr436ePwovaFoLXpsKHFJ/DaLSS+reOOxTZGRBnqp8q9yBdkcWuKF5SfB IO/4C/RmeVRjdJHeL+KhzCHPVqJmeiC7k9dmyQHvmHTDATTie4cEymelQX1SMJ/nza7G mwew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UgiIgc/wLsKz+aw2vOvLXueYR5Ax1T2sZwEOYAPP99o=; b=s9znirhTvvdNY1Mmakij0gnsrpmK1RI77qNin6gZmNHLl4iBgaogiEUStrrmHeMD7J YFWG4EpRMtfDDnqP702+s2HZLtghUSzx8RV4LKLQtpXx9ESoL95DbwVuCMWb6F+96Ob3 sDvl6Br6LKYAZR0qIxtISlwFR/yF7edTXWVak9+ZQVqc8cLzVklMh7KZ/mBUwg/0mn8f UXaF0yf2tFomRnLATrIgB8Omr9zvagqdHbAPrrHgBTv5PfWNRrGYf79o6cvsvARqa6Ka Z6R/vXBc2SAmhgzBBfLmTBc+55TbFokX5buubEJGZj6hwI7Fv3gXBGOqrcdUBnbiee23 wbdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ23dXyVN0pGqUuAwf4sezFv+oCdoF8whSU9B9PXVOJOvvZAziJQ xNrFnSLJnRiAFXSjYc0cPVDiLdslqLk5Fs0Xl2o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuDzf3r9H0+K8BsPMGENA+01TTCJYfD8LxF8teu6k4Tz2dbNIX6Z3cRv02czZmxqho1llVON7/Pjjb9gh/fc0U=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce04:: with SMTP id b4mr466726ilo.269.1583985791549; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200311225102.GB2331@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CA+wi2hNBH3jBxwe-_ydjvzi1W7KQ=mF=hhLc1=_wjBL2bUjAuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hNBH3jBxwe-_ydjvzi1W7KQ=mF=hhLc1=_wjBL2bUjAuQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:01:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hMuFukCsP0n-Df410wt+hhXOv_2D7s4ahkQBcGnCKL7Bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: iana@iana.org, BIER WG Chairs <bier-chairs@ietf.org>, bier-ads@ietf.org, BIER WG <bier@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006f45b905a0a06e1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/H_ss0ctjnP1__nqSf7UwIRjOAqc>
Subject: Re: [Bier] Ethertype for non-MPLS BIER suggestion
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:03:14 -0000

oh, I see. no idea what the proper "update" procedure in IEEE is. Someone
feels like ferreting that out?


On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:00 PM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm surprised, there was an official liaison and assignment from IEEE of
> the ethertype. Alia handled it while I remember having filed _the_ forms
> ;-) for her ...
>
> --- tony
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:51 PM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>
>> Dear IANA, BIER leadership
>>
>> Not sure what normal IANA procedures are (or for that matter IEEE
>> procedures),
>> but:
>>
>> I would appreciate if there was an attempt made to update the following
>> record with IEEE:
>>
>> http://standards-oui.ieee.org/ethertype/eth.txt
>>
>>
>> AB37                          IETF Routing Area   Please read
>> draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-12 at
>>                               5177 Brandin Court
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation/.
>>
>>                               Fremont  CA  94538
>>
>>                               US
>>
>> Aka: Ask IEEE to change explanatory text to rfc8296
>>
>> And for that matter, maybe IANA could check the other 7 entries of
>> "draft-ietf" in that registry, and get them updated accordingly.
>>
>> Cheers
>>     Toerless
>>
>> P.S.: Great to see Routing Area has a physical mailbox address at the
>> LLC. Is that the right way to send snail mail to our AD's ? (don't
>> answer, just kidding).
>>
>