IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bier] DR election ...

Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com> Fri, 06 November 2015 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bier@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FD71A854B for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:38:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9smKbdbwBY0x for <bier@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:38:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B0C61A8033 for <bier@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CDS61376; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:38:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 00:38:47 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.75]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 08:38:42 +0800
From: Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, IJsbrand Wijnands <ice@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] DR election ...
Thread-Index: AQHRGCso5CpqZCub5kGQ9O/SyLLvZ56OJi8c
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:38:42 +0000
Message-ID: <DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D64A1@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+b+ERmQuP_ex3CfmDkF39AGPOWZ8uV5X0pFpjvH9CoH4u_oHw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmQuP_ex3CfmDkF39AGPOWZ8uV5X0pFpjvH9CoH4u_oHw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.194.187.92]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F8D64A1nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.563BF698.002D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.75, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 34114e899a9c8bd7b702dc91be78701b
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bier/hJ_oFAHfj446Hvk5atmgGZS0BjM>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bier] DR election ...
X-BeenThere: bier@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"Bit Indexed Explicit Replication discussion list\"" <bier.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bier/>
List-Post: <mailto:bier@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier>, <mailto:bier-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:38:53 -0000

I agree with Robert's comments. I think BIER also should cover active-active and active-standby access scenarios.

Thanks,

weiguo

________________________________
From: BIER [bier-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Robert Raszuk [robert@raszuk.net]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 8:36
To: IJsbrand Wijnands
Cc: bier@ietf.org
Subject: [Bier] DR election ...


Ice,

As we duscussed offline there are practically two major types of multihomed deployments in production networks:

1. True multihoming ... each edge router connect to CEs over different subnet

2. Active/standby .. there is multiaccess lan but VRRP is used so hosts can have single default out.

Now moreover beteen BIER domain and multicast senders and receivers there will pretty much always CEs. I am worried that most BIER slides skip those.

Cheers,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email