Re: [BLISS] Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04

Michael Procter <michael@voip.co.uk> Sat, 25 April 2009 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@voip.co.uk>
X-Original-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032F33A697F for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KWAIUEoSCiJD for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.69]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 020A83A688D for <bliss@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([209.85.220.164]) by na3sys009aob102.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSfKsmt/KTHrxdqdfH7pmtb550Azm2gxC@postini.com; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:24:27 PDT
Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1558638fxm.18 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.243.9 with SMTP id v9mr1782630mur.91.1240640666009; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1DA43737@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
References: <F592E36A5C943E4E91F25880D05AD1140937CB3D@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <a2ef85430904240840l46fe49c0vb856bb9842737bfa@mail.gmail.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1DA43737@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:24:25 +0100
Message-ID: <a2ef85430904242324s7f3a305ci9069f97f08a95669@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Procter <michael@voip.co.uk>
To: Francois Audet <audet@nortel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bliss@ietf.org, Scott Orton <orton@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [BLISS] Comments on draft-procter-bliss-call-park-extension-04
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:23:09 -0000

2009/4/24 Francois Audet <audet@nortel.com>:
>
> I completely agree with you that if we can satisfy all those requirements
> without requiring complex parsers, it would be much better.
>

So, would changing orbit-param to be a pvalue rather than 1*DIGIT be
sufficient for you?  If so, and if I hear no dissenting voices, I'm
happy to make that change.

Michael