Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Mon, 21 December 2009 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C1C28C0D7 for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:46:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7q3SjFQYYMJH for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C30128C145 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,432,1257120000"; d="scan'208";a="65865714"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2009 16:46:18 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-202.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-202.cisco.com [72.163.62.201]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBLGkI8U024439; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:46:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-111.cisco.com ([72.163.62.153]) by xbh-rcd-202.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:46:17 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:46:15 -0600
Message-ID: <067E6CE33034954AAC05C9EC85E2577C73B33B@XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B2F964E.4040804@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)
Thread-Index: AcqCU5CNL1O3QHA8QRm/a7BUsQdsPwACPelw
References: <200912211337.nBLDbDIL007328@boreas.isi.edu> <4B2F964E.4040804@cisco.com>
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2009 16:46:17.0783 (UTC) FILETIME=[1DD94C70:01CA825D]
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, acmorton@att.com, rbonica@juniper.net, dromasca@avaya.com, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:46:35 -0000

Alfred,

Thank you so much for the errata and pointing out these 3 minor
editorial changes. I agree with Carlos to moving this (all three) to
verified.

Cheers,
Rajiv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 10:38 AM
> To: RFC Errata System
> Cc: Aamer Akhter (aakhter); Rajiv Asati (rajiva); dromasca@avaya.com;
> rbonica@juniper.net; acmorton@att.com; ah@TR-Sys.de; bmwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)
> 
> Alfred,
> 
> Thanks much again, good catch. As you correctly identified, in SI the
> abbreviation for prefixes denoting factors greater than 10^3 are
uppercase.
> 
> RFC Editor,
> 
> I think this erratum needs to be moved to Verified state, but I also
> think it (being a typo) is an Editorial and not Technical erratum.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Carlos.
> 
> On 12/21/2009 8:37 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5695,
> > "MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5695&eid=1972
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Technical
> > Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
> >
> > Section: 5 (Table)
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >       [...]
> >
> >       Port Media                       GigE (Gigabit Ethernet),
> >                                        POS, ATM, etc.
> >
> > |     Port Speed                       1 gbps, 100 Mbps, etc.
> >                                          ^
> >       Interface Encapsulation          Ethernet, Ethernet
> >                                        VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc.
> >
> >       [...]
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> >       [...]
> >
> >       Port Media                       GigE (Gigabit Ethernet),
> >                                        POS, ATM, etc.
> >
> > |     Port Speed                       1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc.
> >                                          ^
> >       Interface Encapsulation          Ethernet, Ethernet
> >                                        VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc.
> >
> >       [...]
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > Rationale:
> >   Case matters for powers-of-ten indicating prefix characters in
> >   SI unit designators; "G" = Giga (= 10^9); "g" is still undefined.
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC5695 (draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-06)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for
IP Flows
> > Publication Date    : November 2009
> > Author(s)           : A. Akhter, R. Asati, C. Pignataro
> > Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> > Source              : Benchmarking Methodology
> > Area                : Operations and Management
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> >