Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)
Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com> Mon, 21 December 2009 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E6228C0DE for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:38:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ubD1co5lLpQn for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06BB3A657C for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:38:10 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBLFbo3u006312; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:37:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [64.102.157.137] (dhcp-64-102-157-137.cisco.com [64.102.157.137]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBLFboBl000058; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:37:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B2F964E.4040804@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:37:50 -0500
From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>
Organization: cisco Systems, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <200912211337.nBLDbDIL007328@boreas.isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200912211337.nBLDbDIL007328@boreas.isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
X-Face: *3w8NvnQ|kS~V{&{U}$?G9U9EJQ8p9)O[1[1F'1i>XIc$5FR!hdAIf5}'Xu-3`^Z']h0J* ccB'fl/XJYR[+, Z+jj`4%06nd'y9[ln&ScJT5S+O18e^
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, acmorton@att.com, rbonica@juniper.net, dromasca@avaya.com, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:38:12 -0000
Alfred, Thanks much again, good catch. As you correctly identified, in SI the abbreviation for prefixes denoting factors greater than 10^3 are uppercase. RFC Editor, I think this erratum needs to be moved to Verified state, but I also think it (being a typo) is an Editorial and not Technical erratum. Thanks, -- Carlos. On 12/21/2009 8:37 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5695, > "MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5695&eid=1972 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> > > Section: 5 (Table) > > Original Text > ------------- > [...] > > Port Media GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), > POS, ATM, etc. > > | Port Speed 1 gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. > ^ > Interface Encapsulation Ethernet, Ethernet > VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. > > [...] > > Corrected Text > -------------- > [...] > > Port Media GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), > POS, ATM, etc. > > | Port Speed 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. > ^ > Interface Encapsulation Ethernet, Ethernet > VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. > > [...] > > Notes > ----- > Rationale: > Case matters for powers-of-ten indicating prefix characters in > SI unit designators; "G" = Giga (= 10^9); "g" is still undefined. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5695 (draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-06) > -------------------------------------- > Title : MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows > Publication Date : November 2009 > Author(s) : A. Akhter, R. Asati, C. Pignataro > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Benchmarking Methodology > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972) RFC Errata System
- Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1… Carlos Pignataro
- Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)