Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)

Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com> Mon, 21 December 2009 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E6228C0DE for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:38:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ubD1co5lLpQn for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06BB3A657C for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:38:10 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBLFbo3u006312; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:37:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [64.102.157.137] (dhcp-64-102-157-137.cisco.com [64.102.157.137]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nBLFboBl000058; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:37:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B2F964E.4040804@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:37:50 -0500
From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>
Organization: cisco Systems, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <200912211337.nBLDbDIL007328@boreas.isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200912211337.nBLDbDIL007328@boreas.isi.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
X-Face: *3w8NvnQ|kS~V{&{U}$?G9U9EJQ8p9)O[1[1F'1i>XIc$5FR!hdAIf5}'Xu-3`^Z']h0J* ccB'fl/XJYR[+, Z+jj`4%06nd'y9[ln&ScJT5S+O18e^
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, acmorton@att.com, rbonica@juniper.net, dromasca@avaya.com, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1972)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:38:12 -0000

Alfred,

Thanks much again, good catch. As you correctly identified, in SI the
abbreviation for prefixes denoting factors greater than 10^3 are uppercase.

RFC Editor,

I think this erratum needs to be moved to Verified state, but I also
think it (being a typo) is an Editorial and not Technical erratum.

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On 12/21/2009 8:37 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5695,
> "MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5695&eid=1972
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
> 
> Section: 5 (Table)
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>       [...]
> 
>       Port Media                       GigE (Gigabit Ethernet),
>                                        POS, ATM, etc.
> 
> |     Port Speed                       1 gbps, 100 Mbps, etc.
>                                          ^
>       Interface Encapsulation          Ethernet, Ethernet
>                                        VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc.
> 
>       [...]
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       [...]
> 
>       Port Media                       GigE (Gigabit Ethernet),
>                                        POS, ATM, etc.
> 
> |     Port Speed                       1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc.
>                                          ^
>       Interface Encapsulation          Ethernet, Ethernet
>                                        VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc.
> 
>       [...]
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Rationale:
>   Case matters for powers-of-ten indicating prefix characters in
>   SI unit designators; "G" = Giga (= 10^9); "g" is still undefined.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5695 (draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows
> Publication Date    : November 2009
> Author(s)           : A. Akhter, R. Asati, C. Pignataro
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Benchmarking Methodology
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>