Re: [bmwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5695 (1971)

[Carlos Pignataro <[e-mail]>]

Ack. Thank you again for the fix, Alfred.

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On 12/21/2009 8:32 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5695,
> "MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5695&eid=1971
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 4.1.4.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> (last paragraph:)
> 
>    MPLS label values used in any test case MUST be outside the reserved
> |  label value (0-15) unless stated otherwise.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    MPLS label values used in any test case MUST be outside the reserved
> |  label value range (0-15) unless stated otherwise.
>               ^^^^^^^
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Rationale:
>   "(0-15)" is not "the reserved label value".
>   To avoid confusion, more precise language should be used.
>   Inserting "range" seems to be the smallest sensical change.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5695 (draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows
> Publication Date    : November 2009
> Author(s)           : A. Akhter, R. Asati, C. Pignataro
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Benchmarking Methodology
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>