Re: [bmwg] IGP Data Plane Convergence work item

At 11:59 AM -0400 4/15/04, sporetsky@quarrytech.com wrote:
>BMWG-ers
>
>While everyone is hopped-up on the subject of convergence I think this is a
>good time to assess the status of the IGP Data Plane Convergence work item.
>Over the past 12 months we have received numerous comments from many people.
>Does anyone have any additional comments so that we know the readiness for
>Last Call?
>
>Benchmarking Applicability for IGP Data Plane Route Convergence
></internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-02.txt>(12274
>bytes)
>Terminology for Benchmarking IGP Data Plane Route Convergence
></internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-02.txt>(61350
>bytes)
>Benchmarking Methodology for IGP Data Plane Route Convergence
></internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-02.txt>(28944
>bytes)
>

Scott, once I get my printer unjammed, I will make hard copies and do 
some detailed review. (Actually, as far as I can tell, the printer 
just THINKS it's jammed -- I can't see the paper it thinks is jammed 
in the paper tray).

Perhaps it would be worth knowing -- are there any terminology 
harmonization issues between the IGP and EGP documents?  Is it the 
sense of the working group that IGP and EGP terminology are 
essentially separate? Is there a union-of-sets of terminology common 
to both?

Any general thoughts?

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg