Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call: Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures

Minh Ngoc Tran <mipearlska1307@dcn.ssu.ac.kr> Mon, 19 February 2024 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mipearlska1307@dcn.ssu.ac.kr>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A3EC14F6BD for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 03:17:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcn-ssu-ac-kr.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8eUfwViVje8k for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 03:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C81C2C14F6E2 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 03:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d228a132acso25923111fa.0 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 03:17:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcn-ssu-ac-kr.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1708341453; x=1708946253; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rmGqLYLNrLQrojAC9PVpxo7EcfSaCkEdGAAhckC57MA=; b=FPXxphed5l4LZncH2meumI+eVTAQV7d3q4WIvCpyWkRPpHVbKkoOtJha8WQS9tP8WC QpNYCPInBlL6+eEmpdcVlOdV96s3iqLUrZ3z+jxtwqwshdklwqFztUnshHbsQeg+d4M+ gkXV6BqISouFo96j34cywLtkuCwXmtS5Zk8eVrKuAA2QmxzMD1pXdsuwOzl+Bbwqdi2U VJuC7mnu+kIKhhSxoGoE8BKS5JKvIFfpg0Pe854cTscxUxJpQoi9kL+mnSWuxn7LzVF7 B0D9tMtQFUMIAZqu/JTMrrzq5s4Dc4vkF2uJEPmwGwyq6x9xUKqur0E010kUaQ3QVYpB FfjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708341453; x=1708946253; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rmGqLYLNrLQrojAC9PVpxo7EcfSaCkEdGAAhckC57MA=; b=nviMh3dklN1uV2+PY+n5ckSzIz2Pfn1op+TYz0nwwKD0GZpHH1OGs5VjUKUcB8vykJ PkYyqSNGb9V1uhOGHttfx1+b96mizoaEUlugrmEpF4HdaWLhUQKbA5gqpf9N0DdyfpyX 3ICXo7yqsY9IJIL8ua7wXKurULdVvuNKsl0LC5chos5NLaYE+kYFOZvaDdI5ValyiCh3 a9terrWeUb4JeT+ljwAExKPYMIqbJJIQTl4F/gM1s5sCcPqaoNsRk1Hyr8sXM1fKb1+N 5YZDd78/AsAw99mKnPeomO6OL0gHb/2yglF6tucF8g4sAbkKgsA1yr3QICJX0FM4Omog pRng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzQkMPbtWo7rGHO50WMBPp1ybuPHeuj5S+GNir4fSt79AWUKhpv H8DxN0/tg+LW0OdVpr0AQzy1zYylwAl2E3Y3JhuZDP/w9KZVkr1n3q9+1LitxquxgpD3S+CJ7HR 0Z6hL5tq2AAJuEH1jUbhpJ46WHjEUrwpsxuaGQ1DT5IkZsmrWzw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG09YOqtnLRYILdykB98NarPNkdQZqDaYcXPVOfB+Vsd4FxUp9GivgJa1kIUMWDJnSrb7qS9mTo1Si/4PNAhKQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a714:0:b0:2d2:3aea:bc8c with SMTP id s20-20020a2ea714000000b002d23aeabc8cmr1113054lje.19.1708341453251; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 03:17:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B4C61BA6-541E-4429-B379-C9D8C57C1C83@encrypted.net> <2ECC137F-1963-416F-9B59-DE9A56E8D540@encrypted.net> <37226B3A-64FC-4D1F-AE50-7225EF7CD079@encrypted.net>
In-Reply-To: <37226B3A-64FC-4D1F-AE50-7225EF7CD079@encrypted.net>
From: Minh Ngoc Tran <mipearlska1307@dcn.ssu.ac.kr>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 20:17:22 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHjU8B12hXQWTuqvFKV6t-c=m_LqdPrZdGkV+TfB-0VGR79OFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Cc: bmwg <bmwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000079f4500611ba3df1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/F1j8VfHjcZ9otNB1aINtFKtNvxw>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call: Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:17:39 -0000

Hi Sarah,

We have prepared a new update for our draft since the adoption notice.
Can we upload the new update version with the document name
"draft-ietf-bmwg-containerized-infra-00" and replace the current one?

Best regards,
Ngoc

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM sbanks@encrypted.net <sbanks@encrypted.net>
wrote:

> Folks,
> I apologize; this was the message I meant to send for the other draft! The
> confusion is all mine. We are announcing the ADOPTION of this draft; I’ll
> make the change in data tracker shortly. I look forward to updates at IETF
> 119!
>
> Thank you,
> Sarah
>
> On Jan 23, 2024, at 6:09 AM, sbanks@encrypted.net wrote:
>
> Hello BMWG,
> Following up on the WGLC for the "Considerations for Benchmarking Network
> Performance in Containerized Infrastructures” draft. There was reasonable
> support for this document on the list, and we’ll start the WGLC process.
> Thank you all for your readership, feedback, and discussion during the
> face-to-face meetings. Authors, please reach out to me with any questions
> you have.
>
> Thank you,
> Sarah
> BMWG Co-Chair
>
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 1:12 PM, sbanks@encrypted.net wrote:
>
> Hello BMWG,
>
> 	I just sent out a note asking the WG to consider a WGLC, and this note is a call for adoption of a draft that’s been reasonably well reviewed and discussed by the WG. I’d like to run both of these in parallel.
>
>
> 	This message begins a WG Adoption call for:
>
>
> 		Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures
>
> 		https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dcn-bmwg-containerized-infra/
>
>
>
> 	The WG Adoption call will run from December 7 to January 4, 2024. Please review the latest draft and send comments and/or indications of support to the BMWG mailing list (bmwg@ietf.org).
>
>
> For the co-chairs,
>
> Sarah
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>


-- 

__________________________________

*Minh-Ngoc Tran*

*Distributed Cloud and Network lab*

*Soongsil University *

*511 Sangdo-dong Dongjak-gu*

*Seoul, 156-743 Korea*

*TEL : (+82)-2-820-0841 *