IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call: Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures

"sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net> Tue, 23 January 2024 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282A8C14F726 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 06:10:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=encrypted.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJNAtl9Rbe0P for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 06:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xyz.hosed.org (xyz.hosed.org [71.114.67.91]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0D2C14F6F7 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 06:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BB719C3864 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:10:08 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xyz.hosed.org
Received: from xyz.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xyz.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JywgdHuRCZ_m for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:10:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-170-253-92.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.170.253.92]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 097FB19C11D6 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:10:07 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=encrypted.net; s=default; t=1706019008; bh=NHv3G7z6MZrHn83WbVQNiUqi+Kub5TUjN9UbdofCufA=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=xOYJP2sKPq+DCa9Iy2XGJwAde3sc47rENmnxXDb7bQ6QxU8V8Kw8yIOCNzuRKGjjC QAFA2jTshNjn7YQ/wB0SoiSM+T60JpSom9QBJmDSwof4a/8qC0gPq5VnuHFL110xc2 OAhjrpKfhvzUuXl3MNymzpr2NZG2ihFXFgyLwczc=
From: "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_041E7A26-BBCE-4E5A-9C4C-7E51CDD024EE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 06:09:57 -0800
References: <B4C61BA6-541E-4429-B379-C9D8C57C1C83@encrypted.net>
To: bmwg <bmwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <B4C61BA6-541E-4429-B379-C9D8C57C1C83@encrypted.net>
Message-Id: <2ECC137F-1963-416F-9B59-DE9A56E8D540@encrypted.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/sh_u99Fm8BQaiMMO1oiKUsV5TDY>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG Adoption Call: Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:10:14 -0000

Hello BMWG,
	Following up on the WGLC for the "Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures” draft. There was reasonable support for this document on the list, and we’ll start the WGLC process. Thank you all for your readership, feedback, and discussion during the face-to-face meetings. Authors, please reach out to me with any questions you have.

Thank you,
Sarah
BMWG Co-Chair

> On Dec 6, 2023, at 1:12 PM, sbanks@encrypted.net wrote:
> 
> Hello BMWG,
> 	I just sent out a note asking the WG to consider a WGLC, and this note is a call for adoption of a draft that’s been reasonably well reviewed and discussed by the WG. I’d like to run both of these in parallel.
> 
> 	This message begins a WG Adoption call for:
> 
> 		Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures
> 		https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dcn-bmwg-containerized-infra/
> 
> 
> 	The WG Adoption call will run from December 7 to January 4, 2024. Please review the latest draft and send comments and/or indications of support to the BMWG mailing list (bmwg@ietf.org <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>).
> 
> For the co-chairs,
> Sarah
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email