IETF Logo Mail Archive

[bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results

Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp> Tue, 03 July 2018 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <itou@toyo.co.jp>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A25130DF3 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 23:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=toyo.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TTUyGf81SKDB for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 23:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from JPN01-TY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ty1jpn01on062c.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe9d::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91195120049 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 23:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toyo.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-toyo-co-jp; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=46g0mnHNIpa6Th25X/aNodLcPtcx3s7IdrMnbCCrZnU=; b=g37X9Nk4Sa96GprikLmR55fJu8YuaxsYKEEkxRhc1qK/143v4DndIKZBwiQhmxZIhxUtUkXa/yiHSGTQCXO7fNtjynSlUgKLuGGj843Aq+tyO8CjCrpOeMMUhh1B87RUPnPhW0t4JBI/Z6BszJPNrRGv+sOlnSt89UqFy31IO30=
Received: from OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (52.134.227.14) by OSBPR01MB1591.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (52.134.226.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.906.25; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 06:06:24 +0000
Received: from OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dce6:c73c:9940:e886]) by OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::dce6:c73c:9940:e886%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0906.026; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 06:06:23 +0000
From: Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp>
To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results
Thread-Index: AdQSk3wi6Fwy2EbaTkCf8NykKEWJqA==
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 06:06:23 +0000
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB1701B890AEC4E4AC02FD011DE6420@OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=itou@toyo.co.jp;
x-originating-ip: [122.23.199.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; OSBPR01MB1591; 7:3fTKuPSByGfeHeO6LHb/FzUBUHmaYFhv6VaOzwJmtwQ76kn4AtudYTQBlaGXVgH9nXSRsueNl9iTGmyr6FUCbRHatvGvgiy+3FMFoeN+ScU0whdilFXJgb+fX2zm1rCoQ9CWTNsl3B/qbHo3UgsEUCk2eRk17C1Xg7Tni9jgeCIWxqtUiaGH9vPnO29seHdEcqXhjZMixF+R6ivvQ1Fs52z8gsow1d+//GZsKPHmQEm9L72Kcp3boeTwVvuNgLNQ; 20:zWSeyrxY6kGGX7iwIRJ3KHI5oQEaTgUklSUFj7FabjL9eK/qT0bRj7PIOYNZfG78jP4jr2KQ0m9gdtG2XuvzB+12/HFu/iRJbrKW+bDh6jECdRIzVzgNw/ipd32UWkjUrMaakJAND9pocuwiJgtabyLXmAPQrGk8rIq5lvZ1uUc=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2918b567-6070-4a54-192f-08d5e0ab1b02
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(7021125)(8989117)(5600053)(711020)(4534165)(7022125)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990107)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7028125)(7023125)(2017052603328)(7153060)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:OSBPR01MB1591;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: OSBPR01MB1591:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <OSBPR01MB15910DCB8CF6BC49D67B0401E6420@OSBPR01MB1591.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(21748063052155);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(3002001)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(2016111802025)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:OSBPR01MB1591; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:OSBPR01MB1591;
x-forefront-prvs: 0722981D2A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(136003)(39850400004)(396003)(376002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(6506007)(99286004)(316002)(1857600001)(6306002)(26005)(33656002)(5640700003)(7696005)(106356001)(186003)(5250100002)(81156014)(55016002)(2900100001)(2501003)(99936001)(6436002)(81166006)(54896002)(9686003)(102836004)(105586002)(8936002)(8676002)(1730700003)(486006)(3846002)(74482002)(25786009)(97736004)(2351001)(5024004)(256004)(6116002)(478600001)(74316002)(5660300001)(7736002)(53936002)(476003)(86362001)(66066001)(6916009)(14454004)(68736007)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:OSBPR01MB1591; H:OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: toyo.co.jp does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: iqhU60a1/SwqkWi2xVx/EnI6m3aTt9U8GGd1gPCcBYH6YQL2zrjolQcfKRXR4Hw/NOQhqytLu1WC7nA/flWgOL4haBI6xIIp5JB7lbFSd1s5o8picIcBGKOcmmPhXQ8gdKnlcVVIw/BtGcZkWDX+ctDFL7HXVdCwzAvT2/2AdJafLX0JsDKiKCwSo5x/VsIO4/KJDit/p1+IxK7pFTUkx5scCMwyuf/No7+iXooC6dkfUChSOtiv6cb2iXRiaJ1lCvEUKcOCB+jIyamz95PAX3DmemXxvdrB7gh82RFkG7B4on5CzrLW/DPp8XS4DMw+ekKOqQp6fDoAYymSbKvu/tG/34se+a1zHCwGRiqEDMw=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_OSBPR01MB1701B890AEC4E4AC02FD011DE6420OSBPR01MB1701jpnp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: toyo.co.jp
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2918b567-6070-4a54-192f-08d5e0ab1b02
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Jul 2018 06:06:23.8070 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 40c50b8d-0fe2-4bba-8e02-5e19289bd70d
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: OSBPR01MB1591
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/GEJEYob8h1msUnh37uebrqas-hA>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 05:03:43 -0700
Subject: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 06:06:35 -0000

Hello BMWG,

I have measured buffer size of a DUT using RFC 8239 buffering testing. (Please see the attached)
It seems packet-by-packet latency measurement method is a more precise.
However, the increase in latency due to multiple physical ports may not be linearly proportional therefore further improvement is necessary I think.
Could you have any comment for this results?

I am going to measure buffer size of some switches.
Then I would like to have the comparison between draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame-02 and RFC 8239.

Best Regards,
Yoshiaki Itou/TOYO Corporation

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email