Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results
Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp> Tue, 06 November 2018 02:53 UTC
Return-Path: <itou@toyo.co.jp>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA9A130DD2 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:53:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=toyo.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8v411xmm2-0X for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from JPN01-OS2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-os2jpn01on0075.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.92.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC2B130DD1 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:53:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toyo.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-toyo-co-jp; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xuczJtR6IXtDsK1/BvnFDG5kaLx+K+kS+Yb9zdZjgFo=; b=BFP8Lhh0cLvxK5vY2AUtNN4DketKgrR6cwXyLZ2m/+elvcqDZ7QApHd0yz9TbrNJ1YrZHncz9Qd+xt0qToiwrAttjof5ldfT+CqnYju1dxHhgTIhz6OFlN14XHUakE3mn1Jgq6EYJJsY0sbjDLEZpoawSN8NaGEWbveC4hQXaeM=
Received: from OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (52.134.227.14) by OSBPR01MB2695.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com (20.176.240.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1294.26; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:53:37 +0000
Received: from OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::713d:59f6:35d:3952]) by OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::713d:59f6:35d:3952%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1294.032; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:53:37 +0000
From: Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>, Jacob Rapp <jrapp@vmware.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results
Thread-Index: AdQSk3wi6Fwy2EbaTkCf8NykKEWJqALM7rsAAAqkBwABVHyooBFSlArgAEa7mDAC66gywAAJAepA
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 02:53:37 +0000
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB17019C7B3D2E6742C8F40523E6CB0@OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <OSBPR01MB1701B890AEC4E4AC02FD011DE6420@OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> <8AB0F2CF-FCC3-4644-937E-30DF1A46D2EB@vmware.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4A93A014@njmtexg4.research.att.com> <OSBPR01MB17012BD5972BB25F315F618CE6550@OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF557A3556@njmtexg5.research.att.com> <OSBPR01MB1701EA8F2A42BCFC96BD3E33E6F40@OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF557DA151@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF557DA151@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=itou@toyo.co.jp;
x-originating-ip: [202.232.197.33]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; OSBPR01MB2695; 6:ehcvm8p5rTaTcVTpdD0tt5V337kP9GQv9L/3I5RMzOmgCuRhKMf2SqWfYQdTegEDWwf/vwoCRdTTFDJHJnavirs1ltdBeCWqKYpG+1hCdSRoCeV8a4N986CWGLbfAQHr8RtjN4g9LaNrZnpKaHfUQRkXgch5yZqZCZo4P3hGQYFibqA5bYD7RupbBm5ieXI05/dqyhvtihCx/WDUFsMJxZNhVEG880uSgypQtA0qhUdniYix8IP9dRP0BZHAIhKKvhK11q3aOO3M3buKdpRGc+GKWCKXWfHlR7+xfhkw44CoRoLelQ9TPE/GTd6LRVcOETWzpnE1vOLzRKRb3vXT4ycGAlqEGwjoXfAYqImvrvYmtqwjcrhBfDGoS9n+ekZfPMQIp0cFb6/o8ecOke4tkGzS5sNTxpnXocI12CrLMW6JDxnaHv7IgAOkQlMmKyFUqILvRUHT+DfSZOwjinRUvw==; 5:7IW6f71vdCdbBFQ4Qgsy+NcY88s8EhSU2n7Z4zJ1LckyclGJyElKoHqZb728Xg5Nx0y3mHRSzawugbMY00BJwpZsl0t8cu5zNqvF8pYzAdtdKS74iPwRp9DCarmWpll4k+fI6y+U1HO1GSJzfMfDdK+NAZT6DPWGA/VUl54tz5Y=; 7:9sCuJfOjw8NFdUty/12+q8oFpjkrywB6hYJmJOjL5vUaFjTOcpwmxR14jY6ufhvJzE9sumNlJmF/77581k66jfzQcxW7o43piaZ7UvV1rBXJZlIi5+o/ZZQOh+p+NYfnf0j7fzwxoJHist/DM2h2Tw==
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c29f3ccd-5857-46ac-c8f6-08d643930cd1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:OSBPR01MB2695;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: OSBPR01MB2695:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <OSBPR01MB269535468F607E0FD2FAF615E6CB0@OSBPR01MB2695.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(97927398514766)(61668805478150)(120809045254105)(21748063052155)(28532068793085)(190501279198761)(227612066756510);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231382)(944501410)(52105095)(148016)(149066)(150057)(6041310)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(201708071742011)(7699051)(76991095); SRVR:OSBPR01MB2695; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:OSBPR01MB2695;
x-forefront-prvs: 0848C1A6AA
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(376002)(39850400004)(346002)(136003)(366004)(497574002)(189003)(199004)(81166006)(97736004)(256004)(99286004)(2501003)(86362001)(11346002)(446003)(76176011)(186003)(81156014)(53546011)(6506007)(8676002)(71190400001)(102836004)(71200400001)(74482002)(74316002)(68736007)(110136005)(66066001)(7696005)(25786009)(7736002)(2900100001)(14454004)(6436002)(33656002)(229853002)(2906002)(53936002)(6246003)(966005)(5660300001)(6116002)(3846002)(26005)(486006)(93886005)(345774005)(55016002)(476003)(478600001)(8936002)(236005)(9686003)(54896002)(105586002)(606006)(14444005)(6306002)(106356001)(5024004)(316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:OSBPR01MB2695; H:OSBPR01MB1701.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: toyo.co.jp does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gKjWwYxvZJuj6yQgeslchiwuK0z/bidBhZSm4PgqEkfOG3WJUZM5BeVbf/skxu63w6gHbOIiJcMLpPAY7Labjh8m51mKC0JgLEsaPzC+PXN9wCCN4zoOKc6TXfSrSOVdh1DrMotHGv9znKyte7khi/6RxIX5EcW+NBhlm06nbQ3MtwHJWzxffNax7oexOPUAav7vUwam9yfrfRd8IpSZe84K66QjuBDdxWGhi11xf8Xdu3IObtJKVs4PcbB3nac6KU0HpS/oosYbzcAfnvQ2i37b0QJjSrJIeUKfJUtqTwfi1h4pVbf7Y1GoL0czWue95qYqHdHxQn8iAl4zI+YicxuhMVNZMB/5JG+wfXg20yY=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_OSBPR01MB17019C7B3D2E6742C8F40523E6CB0OSBPR01MB1701jpnp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: toyo.co.jp
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c29f3ccd-5857-46ac-c8f6-08d643930cd1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Nov 2018 02:53:37.1750 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 40c50b8d-0fe2-4bba-8e02-5e19289bd70d
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: OSBPR01MB2695
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/tb5A4pwwRfLtKZo039Y7YqF87Qs>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 02:53:45 -0000
Hello Morton-san, Thank you for inviting me to the meeting. Unfortunately I am not convenient for the day and can not join the conference. I am pleased if you invite me next time. Best Regards, Yoshiaki Itou From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 7:36 AM To: Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp>; Jacob Rapp <jrapp@vmware.com>; bmwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Hi Yoshiaki, We have placed your topic on the BMWG agenda: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/agenda.html#2018-11-08-080000 If you can join us remotely, that would be great! We are meeting in a convenient time-zone... regards, Al bmwg co-chair From: Yoshiaki Itou [mailto:itou@toyo.co.jp] Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 9:50 PM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com<mailto:acm@research.att.com>>; Jacob Rapp <jrapp@vmware.com<mailto:jrapp@vmware.com>>; bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Hello Morton-san, Thank you for your interest in Pause method. I am pleased that you are discussing this method at the IETF-103 meeting. Best Regards, Yoshiaki Itou From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com<mailto:acm@research.att.com>> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 1:10 AM To: Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp<mailto:itou@toyo.co.jp>>; Jacob Rapp <jrapp@vmware.com<mailto:jrapp@vmware.com>>; bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Hi Yoshiaki, I’m sorry for the long delay to reply! Your message was in a very long ToDo list... Your Pause method, described in the later slides of your power-point deck, looks very interesting and appears to be effective. It looks as though you conducted some testing successfully, too! I would like to hear what other folks in BMWG think about your new method. Perhaps we can discuss it during our session at IETF-103 in Bangkok. It appears this would be a useful addition to RFC 8239. regards, Al (as a participant) From: Yoshiaki Itou [mailto:itou@toyo.co.jp] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 7:53 AM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com<mailto:acm@research.att.com>>; Jacob Rapp <jrapp@vmware.com<mailto:jrapp@vmware.com>>; bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Hello Morton-san, Jacob-san and all, Thank you for your detail explanation. In order to more accurately measure the number of frames buffered in the DUT, I tried a method(PAUSE) in which the frame does not flow to the Rx side during frame transmission. Could you have any comment for this results? Best Regards, Yoshiaki Itou From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com<mailto:acm@research.att.com>> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 2:20 AM To: Jacob Rapp <jrapp@vmware.com<mailto:jrapp@vmware.com>>; Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp<mailto:itou@toyo.co.jp>>; bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Thanks for replying on this thread Jacob. Incidentally, I added the Section 3 Scope paragraph delineating the RFC 8239 methods out-of-scope *after* Yoshiaki and I exchanged several messages. Al From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jacob Rapp Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 12:11 PM To: Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp<mailto:itou@toyo.co.jp>>; bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Thanks for reaching out. Over the years of using these tests myself, I find many different switch architectures may measure differently, but this is expected. The tests themselves were designed to test the actual buffer available for use under various combination of oversubscribing ports, which your test results are reporting. For example, some switches have dedicated buffer for every 4 ports, so if you are testing across the boundaries of these various buffer chips, you may see some “interesting results”. Another example would be when a switch goes from cut-through to store-and-forward operation after a given frame size (we cover this in a different section). Another example would be a switch architecture that uses ingress buffering vs. egress buffering. “Interesting results” are also valid results and the goal of these tests were to flush out the “interesting results” so when evaluating different DUTs you have the complete story vs. what a data sheet will claim on buffer size. As for the draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame-02, it has a different goal and specifically calls out : “Section 3 of [RFC8239] describes buffer size testing for physical networking devices in a Data Center. The [RFC8239] methods measure buffer latency directly with traffic on multiple ingress ports that overload an egress port on the Device Under Test (DUT), and are not subject to the revised calculations presented in this memo.” Thanks, -- Jacob From: bmwg <bmwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Yoshiaki Itou <itou@toyo.co.jp<mailto:itou@toyo.co.jp>> Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 2:06 AM To: "bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>" <bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>> Subject: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Hello BMWG, I have measured buffer size of a DUT using RFC 8239 buffering testing. (Please see the attached) It seems packet-by-packet latency measurement method is a more precise. However, the increase in latency due to multiple physical ports may not be linearly proportional therefore further improvement is necessary I think. Could you have any comment for this results? I am going to measure buffer size of some switches. Then I would like to have the comparison between draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame-02 and RFC 8239. Best Regards, Yoshiaki Itou/TOYO Corporation
- [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Yoshiaki Itou
- Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Jacob Rapp
- Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Yoshiaki Itou
- Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Yoshiaki Itou
- Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] RFC 8239 buffering testing results Yoshiaki Itou