[bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09
William Cerveny <bmwg@wjcerveny.com> Mon, 07 April 2014 18:12 UTC
Return-Path: <bmwg@wjcerveny.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DCF1A047A for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WT_Wktt5x0Gg for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6C91A0811 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3746E20BE7 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:12:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=KAhT3Z3GADjRI+X0OiMCPkIUeXE=; b=u5Cfonu4nhH49yeAbKd32twkMZxH ohwZyY3v1ik/mHVPb0JYymMs8BcTAxX/2WWQ5/5lEOKDBY9mRYKCIBvCX8nnWAVR zmWcqC9p3fQu/3UV96pUom85vZOOqJ+vC5bTeTPGHJYnAUSm54A3rV8aoU8gb4Vm MgqowTr7sSqaamQ=
Received: by web1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0FFA6F00A6A; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1396894332.21912.103764125.7550637A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: WGD3iYAL3s+ybi1gA2Alce2aw0OmBYkaPBm+/nNX87aK 1396894332
From: William Cerveny <bmwg@wjcerveny.com>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3bcd941f
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:12:12 -0400
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/K3K5e7wzXiZ8cVgmc1Ze8kIyNzw
Subject: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 18:12:26 -0000
My general comments about draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09
1) Where the term has an associated acronym, include that acronym in the
definition title ... this is done in some cases, but not in others
2) Replace instances of "work item" with "document"
3) In section "3.4.2 Registration Rates", the document says:
This benchmark is obtained with zero failures in which 100% of the
registrations attempted by the EA are successfully completed by
the DUT.
Is "zero failures" redundant in the above text since 100% success would
imply "zero failures"?
I've sent smaller comments directly to the authors.
Regards,
Bill Cerveny
- [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term… William Cerveny
- Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-… Carol Davids