Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09

[Carol Davids <[e-mail]>]

Thanks.  We will make the changes: consistently putting the acronym with
the definition title, and replacing the ³work item² with ³document.²

³Zero failures² does correspond to "100% success", and we could remove
"%100 success." We left it in for emphasis. We might find a different way
to accomplish that.

Regards.

Carol

Carol Davids
Professor &  Director RTC Lab
Illinois Institute of Technology
Office: 630-682-6024
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Skype: caroldavids1
Web: rtc-lab.itm.iit.edu








On 4/7/14, 1:12 PM, "William Cerveny" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>My general comments about draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-09
>1) Where the term has an associated acronym, include that acronym in the
>definition title ... this is done in some cases, but not in others
>2) Replace instances of "work item" with "document"
>3) In section "3.4.2 Registration Rates", the document says:
>
>This benchmark is obtained with zero failures in which 100% of the
>      registrations attempted by the EA are successfully completed by
>      the DUT.
>
>Is "zero failures" redundant in the above text since 100% success would
>imply "zero failures"?
>
>I've sent smaller comments directly to the authors.
>
>Regards,
>
>Bill Cerveny
>
>_______________________________________________
>bmwg mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg