Re: [bmwg] <draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-00.txt>

s.poretsky@verizon.net Fri, 19 September 2003 17:11 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA15208 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A0NnB-0001rl-JA; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:07:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A0NmC-0001Rw-VG for bmwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:06:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA06951 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: s.poretsky@verizon.net
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A0BEQ-0001sk-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:42:51 -0400
Received: from out003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.103] helo=out003.verizon.net) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A0B25-0007Zl-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:30:05 -0400
Received: from poretsky ([141.157.186.2]) by out003.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030919022936.NWHA29617.out003.verizon.net@poretsky>; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:29:36 -0500
Message-ID: <006101c37e55$d2d4fec0$6401a8c0@poretsky>
To: "Kevin Dubray" <kdubray@juniper.net>, <bmwg@ietf.org>
References: <3F69AF31.1040500@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] <draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-00.txt>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:29:10 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out003.verizon.net from [141.157.186.2] at Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:29:35 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Dubray" <kdubray@juniper.net>
To: <bmwg@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: [bmwg] <draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-00.txt>


> Hi,
>
> I infer from the minutes of the Vienna meeting post by Al to this list,
> that Failure/Error definitions are in the works for this I-D.  Yes?

Yes.  We will have this submitted before the deadline.  If you would like it
sooner, then please let us know.

>
> To me, these definitions are critical for any testing having to do
> with reliability.
> Which brings me to my next question, what separates the scope of this
> work from reliability testing?

I do not not think this has anything to do with reliability testing.  What
do you mean by "reliability testing"?

Scott

>
> -Kevin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg


_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg