IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Fri, 09 June 2017 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406D31294A1; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQdcbgzps52f; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A6912943B; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0083689.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v59E6DG8039216; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:10:06 -0400
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2aytjkm0vm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:10:06 -0400
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v59EA4Mh081512; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:10:05 -0500
Received: from dalint01.pst.cso.att.com (dalint01.pst.cso.att.com [135.31.133.159]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v59EA022081475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:10:01 -0500
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (clpi183.sldc.sbc.com [135.41.1.46]) by dalint01.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 9 Jun 2017 14:09:44 GMT
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v59E9hiN001916; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:09:44 -0500
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (mail-azure.research.att.com [135.207.255.18]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v59E9Zfl001481; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:09:35 -0500
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas2.research.att.com [135.207.255.47]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1D4E0521; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:09:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njmtcas2.research.att.com ([fe80::d550:ec84:f872:cad9%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:09:34 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>, "bmwg-chairs@ietf.org" <bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv@ietf.org>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHS4R3SVrz8MKFmnUC75cmrGvf8q6Ic032A//+9VBA=
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 14:09:33 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF25FD7B3B@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <149701213054.30067.9344581960553002293.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHw9_iLOHfNwwcC2ET27vxJTqrz8XCgTheLRKr7N5kjf6z1n3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLOHfNwwcC2ET27vxJTqrz8XCgTheLRKr7N5kjf6z1n3g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.211.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-09_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706090247
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/aeDK112skfDepl5nB9aTe3NxMhc>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 14:10:13 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren Kumari [mailto:warren@kumari.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 10:05 AM
> To: Alissa Cooper
> Cc: The IESG; sbanks@encrypted.net; bmwg-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
> bmwg-vswitch-opnfv@ietf.org; bmwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-
> opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)
> 
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: No Objection
> >
...
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and comments. One nit:
> >
> > s/for a future draft/for a future document/
> >
> 
> Good catch! Thank you for helping improve the document - I think that
> the changes make it much better.
[ACM] 
+1, and for seeing the value in this draft as a contribution/RFC.
Benoit's comments helped capture that value more accurately,
too.

> 
> Dear authors, please note this to flag for the RFC Editor ( will as
> well, but just in case).
[ACM] 
Will do, at AUTH48 or sooner.

Al

> 
> W
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email