Re: [bmwg] Favor: Confirm Errata 5207

Lucien Avramov <lucienav@google.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lucienav@google.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ECD12D945 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:58:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LpFFxMZ4C0ue for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF92F124B0A for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a90so10262177pfk.1 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:58:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=V3DCPtE1miVNqClbKaBf7ve+ZQjorqE2AfPDEOkiSGo=; b=U/c3l2UbJECZPArw8pzd7Pf9Kj2qIBiJPrJ4u9slbkhPwvb70OnlDj/vOfH/SbMC4+ aAjBCcwrsMYx+3Eqq7HWY79dcr0OtnXr0ZC/HRU5sLz4/OTs1z0Sr/rVpcQX+uiWvz+0 QXup6UX2SPtLZoKmzPiqwwNtoowRNDzhvD+XDNlh7Aniiubu3VNarH5cu7pmDii6NLeZ Lh3o3wJhdPq1ewH3tPtumhU+MA5u4WvB9f4RELCVNVNHmm3zCzdqfZi+IHLkpuqwJAMr WbuP50YK6BpfKmi1B4lYjZIpQSg86SnJDlSrZ0QxLwm/ukGYPhy9ZXZXkLQpTudXOtEX RAWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=V3DCPtE1miVNqClbKaBf7ve+ZQjorqE2AfPDEOkiSGo=; b=tFtbPfJXs5OWWlBhL3+BSx6YsP1onlvh5E2hCTn4B/9F3kQsm99zmdjmUhGF+cbEsE vBSm2vVpezCwLFQtHKXj1L37BPhS/Yel0W38/1Xb738rxnv8e1TRSo4MTxYij8VdR7mY d3CouSjas9k1glDeCrAlGeyEoRzSFpfaO8dnndTk2XAqL6bKeGWq5MkuLT5A7DNaASK9 U8EqDjd2TVdRkZXxNjMrokAOuDaQ7r/FYLhH/0dbf5BE1aHlPHhmlIGoNKjCDjXE8SMp 6S5DjObtjr04NwiPIwsghk1nQDvVJTtuxpfaxebYhyc9Jkf9WWUfdeo6lsVnB+E/jE4e TtMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIYxMGg8FZMqNjur9mEo8yUzpKoWqqrSgsEEUTcixfg9QwsEq7V bGj5/tQ9+GkAAGFidzYHMIPxKF+iYGw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou0aRiCVI87IamajmXG/mp1rlZZghdRCC5+XMhAFQTvEZBcqpTnA+hHh2/eNY3y9G0Phtid5w==
X-Received: by 10.99.149.4 with SMTP id p4mr923035pgd.73.1513634326806; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:58:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:15c:2c3:fd00:6814:4cf:4beb:b453? ([2620:15c:2c3:fd00:6814:4cf:4beb:b453]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm6659239pgq.38.2017.12.18.13.58.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:58:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Lucien Avramov <lucienav@google.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15C114)
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iLpr3Oy1+6QcABZQvhP3_ZYqwGiqyWaAVVMDWAQciYviw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:58:44 -0800
Cc: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A663BF0-CE45-483C-9788-641B22E63621@google.com>
References: <CAHw9_iKmPer65KBoTBs-sim0ZY5mxJY14ts-FHBUFhnVHB9QCg@mail.gmail.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4907B984@njmtexg4.research.att.com> <CAHw9_iLpr3Oy1+6QcABZQvhP3_ZYqwGiqyWaAVVMDWAQciYviw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/cC5eMC26Z6Y0JHbvth11g_gUWpQ>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Favor: Confirm Errata 5207
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:58:49 -0000

Is it possible to try to submit Al’s suggestion and see if there are issues with avoiding a -bis? His context is important.

Thank you,
Lucien

> On Dec 18, 2017, at 13:27, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:49 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>> Hi Warren,
>> 
>> I think the fix:
>> 
>> OLD
>>   The DUT SHOULD be able to respond to address resolution requests sent
>>   by the DUT wherever the protocol requires such a process.
>> NEW
>>   The DUT SHOULD be able to respond to address resolution requests sent
>>   by the tester wherever the protocol requires such a process.
>> 
>> is fine, but it would suggest that
>> NEW++
>>   The tester SHOULD be able to respond to address resolution requests sent
>>   by the DUT wherever the protocol requires such a process.
>> 
>> is also needed, for symmetry.
>> 
> 
> While I agree with you, that it likely larger than an Errata can
> cover, and would likely need a -bis document... :-(
> W
> 
>> Al
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari
>>> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 1:00 PM
>>> To: bmwg@ietf.org
>>> Subject: [bmwg] Favor: Confirm Errata 5207
>>> 
>>> Hi there all,
>>> 
>>> This errata looks correct to me, but before I validate it I wanted to
>>> ask the WG to confirm I'm not missing anything obvious.
>>> 
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.rfc-
>>> 2Deditor.org_errata_eid5207&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
>>> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=bjjaUdU3P64iEA1Bgik69SjnzDG
>>> 75gAiRQKHQje6bj8&s=AMJgPjE-e67R_B7CwNtTtd385iZHZryxhsF3IS_Sw3M&e=
>>> 
>>> If I don't hear anything to the contrary I'll mark it verified on
>>> Friday.
>>> 
>>> W
>>> 
>>> --
>>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>>> idea in the first place.
>>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>>> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>>> of pants.
>>>   ---maf
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bmwg mailing list
>>> bmwg@ietf.org
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
>>> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=bjjaUdU3P64iEA1Bgik69SjnzDG
>>> 75gAiRQKHQje6bj8&s=67LX3SMcO-MP3Udz0Fe-zdJfPsMvHmhl73LQBBnvZwo&e=
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>   ---maf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg