Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt
"Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)" <fcalabri@cisco.com> Sat, 05 April 2014 20:04 UTC
Return-Path: <fcalabri@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2471A02C1 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JsbfU9zX5oav for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22391A02C2 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5482; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1396728273; x=1397937873; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=lD3BVTlZbvd5itkZneJaLgZDhX5wNER8wJ6Aavu2BYA=; b=DRkfTIuI0d1PjJ7+30Utd6GxjZS6XtPyDbL70XOYOqgmmetmCXFvtabv FvuTf5wFa21WNZmxWC/ThxqYatYGYQHJ6eTMSW2c/mARl7G0UYhNAIN5U xxtYqdhDYGuwKfy+VyHqAP9y0shArjQoighstZJaeRXQreHiVklOahYSB Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwGAFFgQFOtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABYgwY7V4JASrlRhzcZfBZ0giUBAQEEAQEBCRcROhsCAQYCDgoCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBEod5DY96nBiiJxMEgSmIHYRXITqCb4FJBJhbkj+DMIIr
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,801,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="33315366"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2014 20:04:32 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s35K4WOX017666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 5 Apr 2014 20:04:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.133]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 15:04:32 -0500
From: "Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)" <fcalabri@cisco.com>
To: Dean Lee <dlee@ixiacom.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPP7FW7+nKNwmN106DcSP9VNyO9JsBlFgAgACpGYCAAKYYAIAA0x8A
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:04:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CF65E7B9.14844%fcalabri@cisco.com>
References: <CF64AB52.147DA%fcalabri@cisco.com> <CF657B39.516B2%dlee@ixiacom.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF657B39.516B2%dlee@ixiacom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.82.211.189]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <499B56D42F2AAB4485C7C315BB61EAF4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/ja2doU6xzvFGQIrK9pNAPIov8pI
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:04:42 -0000
Hi there , I personally don’t think u need to discuss the test tool x say, just recommend some generic methodologies and point out the pros and cons of each, like you described in your original reply Rgds Fernando On 4/5/14, 1:28 PM, "Dean Lee" <dlee@ixiacom.com> wrote: >Hi Fernando, > >We initially don’t want to make the benchmark draft tied with specific set >of test tools or test capabilities. Our intention was to make it generic >for the test methodology and allow the readers to choose the tool sets to >best fit their test environments. I thought this has been the guidance >from BMWG. I will discuss with other authors to see if they agree to add >paragraph to describe the possible test tool setup. > >Dean > > > > > > >On 4/4/14, 2:34 PM, "Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)" <fcalabri@cisco.com> >wrote: > >>This is great, don’t you think that the document may benefit with a >>paragraph describing these options and the possible trade-off of each >>approach / technique ? >> >> >>Rgds >> >>Fernando >> >> >> >> >>On 4/4/14, 5:29 PM, "Dean Lee" <dlee@ixiacom.com> wrote: >> >>>Hi Fernando, >>> >>>Thanks for your feedback. >>> >>>We didn’t specify clearly how to capture the arrival time >>>(Tup(DUT,Rt-A)) >>>of advertised routes at DUT because there are multiple options to >>>achieve >>>the same result. We like to leave it to readers and implementers to >>>choose >>>the suitable test tools. To my best knowledge, there are few options to >>>capture the arrival time (Tup(DUT,Rt-A)): >>> >>>* DUT’s log file - as you indicated in the feedback, this option doesn’t >>>offer the best timing resolution and the emulator needs to be >>>synchronized >>>with the time base of DUT. This option is not scalable to deal with >>>large >>>amount of routes. >>> >>>* External analyzer - this option requires an external analyzer to >>>capture >>>NLRI packets between the emulator and DUT. The packets capturing can be >>>done with a TAP device or span port of DUT if applicable. The time base >>>of >>>analyzer and emulator needs to be synchronized. >>> >>>* Hybrid emulator and analyzer - some modern test tools have the >>>capability to capture and timestamp every NLRI packets leaving and >>>arriving at the emulator ports. The timestamps of these NLRI packets >>>will >>>be almost identical to (Tup(DUT,Rt-A)) if the cable distance between the >>>emulator and DUT is relatively short. >>> >>> >>>Dean >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>On 3/14/14, 11:15 AM, "Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)" >>><fcalabri@cisco.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>Hi there, I hope everyone is doing ok and you had a good productive >>>>time >>>>@ London Š >>>> >>>>After reading the doc, I find the methodology as well as the overall >>>>Test >>>>Coverage very well laid out. >>>> >>>>I personally see some room for further improvement / expansion in some >>>>of >>>>the specific procedures, for example: >>>> >>>>5.1.1 RIB-IN Convergence.. Step ³F² >>>> >>>>Record the time when the route A from Peer-x is received at >>>> the DUT. >>>> >>>> >>>>The authors may want to expand here and described how Œexactly¹ the >>>>tester >>>> can measure this specific time. >>>> >>>>I would expect that it is not by relying in any sort of Œdebugs¹ / >>>>logs >>>>, >>>>nor for a single prefix and even worst for the case of multiple ones. >>>> >>>>A suggestion would be to have a ³TAP² or a Sniffer and make note of >>>>the >>>>exact time the UPDATE carrying the corresponding NLRI makes it to the >>>>³wire² >>>> >>>>This comment also applies to 5.1.2 point ³I² and to other Test Cases >>>>as >>>>well. >>>> >>>> >>>>Rgds >>>> >>>>Fernando >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>bmwg mailing list >>>>bmwg@ietf.org >>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg >>> >> >
- [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-conv… Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)
- Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-… Dean Lee
- Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-… Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)
- Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-… Dean Lee
- Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-… Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)