[bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00

Bhavani Parise <bhavani@cisco.com> Wed, 19 March 2014 07:03 UTC

Message-ID: <53294119.6040709@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:02:49 -0700
From: Bhavani Parise <bhavani@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmwg@ietf.org
References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80178E0CCD3@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80178E0CCD3@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/m1mC2jfsO34kwpmYvtVawjLCbtY
Subject: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00
Precedence: list

Al,
    including the WG list also for my comments/Qs for this draft. These 
are a few
things which we can look into including as considerations for this draft.

- do we need to consider or compare performance with the real/physical 
network vs. the virtual network
- in 3.2 do we need Virtual Switch
- also for 3.2 - for VNF itself, do we need location of the VNF - guest 
VM,separate process, appliance etc
- for 3.2 how about load balancers, firewalls - do we need to consider, 
what kind of DPI
    - firewalls - stateful vs stateless
    - what kind of considerations we need to note when testing a Virtual
Firewall Function
- how many Tenants can a VNF support?
- for 3.3 - how about VM mobility or VNF mobility itself


thanks,
Bhavani
________________________________________

[bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00 Bhavani Parise
Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00 Muhammad Durrani
Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00 MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00 ramki Krishnan
Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00 MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00 ramki Krishnan