Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Wed, 09 April 2014 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613341A03A4 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_28=0.6, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Szf7mrrPKcmw for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com (mail-red.research.att.com [204.178.8.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882131A02C6 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-red.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A466955490E; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.242]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BDEF036A; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:06:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841]) by njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com ([fe80::cdea:b3f6:3efa:1841%13]) with mapi; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:06:46 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: ramki Krishnan <ramk@Brocade.com>, Muhammad Durrani <mdurrani@Brocade.com>, Bhavani Parise <bhavani@cisco.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:06:45 -0400
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00
Thread-Index: Ac9DQUDG9rb1/MKIRCaB49COb/+HIAAAk1GwBC45t2AAAgaG2Q==
Message-ID: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80178E0CD25@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
References: <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80178E0CCD3@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> <53294119.6040709@cisco.com> <06FF377397785A4781BD13272EBF3D58231D89E1D9@HQ1-EXCH02.corp.brocade.com>, <C7634EB63EFD984A978DFB46EA5174F2C00372AD68@HQ1-EXCH01.corp.brocade.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7634EB63EFD984A978DFB46EA5174F2C00372AD68@HQ1-EXCH01.corp.brocade.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/uPLA2YnrweH7qpc-RorK2jISmwM
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:06:52 -0000

Hi Ramki,

If you search our past work proposals,  draft-manral-...
proposed energy efficiency metrics and benchmarking.
There is some controversy and complexity on making power
measurements, we need to collect these issues and see what
can be done.

Al 
________________________________________
From: bmwg [bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ramki Krishnan [ramk@Brocade.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 10:12 AM
To: Muhammad Durrani; Bhavani Parise; bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00

Additionally, it would be worthwhile to discuss the common energy efficiency aspects across all VNFs. These would include discussing the tradeoffs between CPU energy efficiency/latency/throughput for various packet processing schemes such as

-        Fixed polling

-        Adaptive polling

-        Changing processor P-states (this could be platform specific)



Thanks,

Ramki



-----Original Message-----
From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Muhammad Durrani
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:27 AM
To: Bhavani Parise; bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00



Hi Bhavani,



- do we need to consider or compare performance with the real/physical network vs. the virtual network

- in 3.2 do we need Virtual Switch



[MD] We do need to provide methodologies to benchmark for three architectures vSwitch/SR-IOV and PCI bypass.

Regarding comparing performance only PCI bypass can be compared with physical world.  Again we are not benchmarking networks here but the virtual appliance and wherever needed comparison will be laid out for both Physical and virtual appliance.



for 3.2 how about load balancers, firewalls - do we need to consider, what kind of DPI

    - firewalls - stateful vs stateless

[MD] Virtual appliance is broader term - it means virtual Load balancer  and firewalls (both state full and stateless) We won't be suggesting "kind of DPI" - Standard method will be provided to qualify appliance for any type of DPI



Regards,

Muhammad

-----Original Message-----

From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bhavani Parise

Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:03 AM

To: bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>

Subject: [bmwg] draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-00



Al,

    including the WG list also for my comments/Qs for this draft. These are a few things which we can look into including as considerations for this draft.



- also for 3.2 - for VNF itself, do we need location of the VNF - guest VM,separate process, appliance etc

-

    - what kind of considerations we need to note when testing a Virtual Firewall Function

- how many Tenants can a VNF support?

- for 3.3 - how about VM mobility or VNF mobility itself





thanks,

Bhavani

________________________________________



_______________________________________________

bmwg mailing list

bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg



_______________________________________________

bmwg mailing list

bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg