Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03.txt
Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Tue, 27 June 2023 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B646C15106B for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBU3US1qrOuO for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85CD6C14CF1E for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.137] (host-79-121-41-55.kabelnet.hu [79.121.41.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 35RGiVXI067414 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:44:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-41-55.kabelnet.hu [79.121.41.55] claimed to be [192.168.1.137]
Message-ID: <705bb9bb-72f0-bb02-b4e9-af491273453f@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:44:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: bmwg@ietf.org
References: <168788278358.61354.10848741861921494386@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <168788278358.61354.10848741861921494386@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.41.55; helo=[192.168.1.137]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.11;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.86 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/v04mJakimbrGGayEyGdDUjtXpvY>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 16:44:48 -0000
Dear BMWG List Members, We have updated our I-D titled "Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers" in two regards: - the usage of multiple IP addresses (a much wider range can be used) - renaming the two test phases from "preliminary test phase" and "real test phase" to "test phase 1" and "test phase 2", respectively. (Rationale: test phase 1 is not only a preparatory test phase for test phase 2, but it is used for measuring the maximum connection establishment rate. Thus, it is also a "real" test phase, therefore, the old names were no more appropriate.) Could you please review the draft? (We would like to ask for a WGLC at IETF 117.) All your comments are welcome! Best regards, Gábor 6/27/2023 6:19 PM keltezéssel, internet-drafts@ietf.org írta: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Benchmarking > Methodology (BMWG) WG of the IETF. > > Title : Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers > Authors : Gábor Lencse > Keiichi Shima > Filename : draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03.txt > Pages : 28 > Date : 2023-06-27 > > Abstract: > RFC 2544 has defined a benchmarking methodology for network > interconnect devices. RFC 5180 addressed IPv6 specificities and it > also provided a technology update, but excluded IPv6 transition > technologies. RFC 8219 addressed IPv6 transition technologies, > including stateful NAT64. However, none of them discussed how to > apply RFC 4814 pseudorandom port numbers to any stateful NATxy > (NAT44, NAT64, NAT66) technologies. We discuss why using > pseudorandom port numbers with stateful NATxy gateways is a difficult > problem. We recommend a solution limiting the port number ranges and > using two test phases (phase 1 and phase 2). We show how the classic > performance measurement procedures (e.g. throughput, frame loss rate, > latency, etc.) can be carried out. We also define new performance > metrics and measurement procedures for maximum connection > establishment rate, connection tear down rate and connection tracking > table capacity measurements. > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful/ > > There is also an htmlized version available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-03 > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg >
- [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-s… internet-drafts
- Re: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarki… Gábor LENCSE