Re: [Bpf] Éric Vyncke's Block on charter-ietf-bpf-00-03: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)
Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 28 May 2023 04:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bpf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bpf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9A5C14CE46; Sat, 27 May 2023 21:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5m09s_-asxdW; Sat, 27 May 2023 21:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BCC2C14F747; Sat, 27 May 2023 21:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-78412128326so1690691241.1; Sat, 27 May 2023 21:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685249220; x=1687841220; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=rCfcYQQhAk3ZzO8OZuelMXonf24iPV5OpLrGogtf09E=; b=BV2M71Qe4wyiaSWkT3fISi9wqeRFEHNbupY/grT+8GzvxQiqAloAGqxgOzPvQXy6yv 2zQ6X2BCaij7P04k06pHV6PwA+uHlS1/PxPZBoOUa3t0iz/zeys3s7dwtRT7EdWh8xcK HNfG2uzQVbATmWJnTagHc/Ey4dtP3yoWTC1RTFgX8xaGmG94C/9TxH3no9m32XMp5B53 URXTTJ3UdRI306gxiceXw+mrimuWBYz0ktE9Makw/OwLl219UMp3QCNKD/Y7BLTAmBEO IfXdTQiDo29LfMt0yb1xyp5Pcdaa4cDTP69XEPxm8MYX5Ccn3XqoRku7SYtw0LEznVgW oMWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685249220; x=1687841220; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rCfcYQQhAk3ZzO8OZuelMXonf24iPV5OpLrGogtf09E=; b=IBlDLedcyREo7B9R5Id9egXEGjs0h1wvTwue2RCg+/+aEbqKuL2NJBFQgM88nawlUa L7wzz9l4UhqTrfe8c9qaGfpw62aRSwGDmeLuhHdHCoHwm9zD5/F2m7E7itMuWeQ5UK2C CRlu3GqZKTaXe6Hl4u0hDerPYRfGXur7hluOLfOydBIhaTBxpuOU54qPnI8BVJ6P4/6A Enh90hXwUtlhg4apRAwig4N33YvXe0XnUDrIIQ9LOBsAUPtrojrS+lP5RHr5wbjnr+du 9al6m5Pc7W21wlscWOcqSH4qDvfP4rK09e33TcGEy+uGF44XhafWGE014bamTm4/vrfA 47rA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxVEXWu2BciA5rpDUIq4qKHnfn6Y2CjjOo7ozu1G2EhAWiZ6ylS lFLfnpLaVfogXxPkM3uGfX5pV3hGToqju46nDdDvxj9z
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5yF1YttypglS/vT0gdLmVMyQ3DfDUnwEuWXS/qO89K21g8RrBaYsxyh8dJ+Ps4bYn2BsPPAuzHcUuSMUcRTmw=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:db8e:0:b0:439:5355:4b77 with SMTP id f14-20020a67db8e000000b0043953554b77mr2234963vsk.9.1685249220090; Sat, 27 May 2023 21:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168492828434.27480.2380770392133973791@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <168492828434.27480.2380770392133973791@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 21:46:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMGpriWUb64LBUDF0d70+DD5aaUO+gPCQ_4502X9iw+KvK6feg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, bpf-chairs@ietf.org, bpf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/Wj1O3b5rkCdi4k6uFTJ7mAIFt_M>
Subject: Re: [Bpf] Éric Vyncke's Block on charter-ietf-bpf-00-03: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bpf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of BPF/eBPF standardization efforts within the IETF <bpf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bpf>, <mailto:bpf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bpf/>
List-Post: <mailto:bpf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bpf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf>, <mailto:bpf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 04:47:05 -0000
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 4:38 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-bpf-00-03: Block > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bpf/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > BLOCK: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is a very nice and interesting piece of work and, as soon as the BLOCK > comments are addressed, I intend to ballot a YES. They should be trivial to > address: > > 1) What is the intended status of those documents ? Everything's annotated now with [PS] and [I] (and accompanying legend). > 2) Should there be collaboration / discussion with other fora / SDOs ? The penultimate paragraph says that the working group will actively engage with the BPF foundation and broader implementation community. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Very minor comments, feel free to ignore them. > > s/There is currently no formal standard for eBPF/There is currently no formal > specification for eBPF/ > > s/bpf/BPF/ > > Should ELF and ABI be expanded ? > > The milestones timeline looks quite optimistic to me but who knows ? And others have said there are too few. :D I've opted to list only the main Instruction Set Architecture for now. There is much to be learned about how everyone will work together. I'll defer to chairs and ADs in the future to assess reasonable timelines for getting to the rest of the docs. > -- > Bpf mailing list > Bpf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
- [Bpf] Éric Vyncke's Block on charter-ietf-bpf-00-… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [Bpf] Éric Vyncke's Block on charter-ietf-bpf… Erik Kline