RE: [Bridge-mib] Draft-ietf-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2 Issues Resolution

>From the experts floor at the IEEE 802.1 interim meeting where I happen to be right now - the maximum number of ports on a 802.1D bridge is 4k-1. Thus the 512 bytes size limit is justified. 

Regards,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: 12 January, 2005 12:33 AM
> To: David B Harrington
> Cc: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; bridge-mib@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Bridge-mib] Draft-ietf-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2 
> Issues Resolution
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:17:28PM -0500, David B Harrington wrote:
> 
> > 3) the range has been constrained in the revision. This is probably
> > not a problem, but it is a semantic change.
> 
> Does someone recall where the introduced size limit for 
> ...AllowedToGoTo
> object comes from?  The port index is restricted to 65535 and 
> from that
> perspective the upper boundary would be 8K and not 512 bytes (which 
> is equivalent to a maximum of 4096 ports). Can some IEEE 802.1 expert
> please explain this?
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bridge-mib mailing list
> Bridge-mib@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> 

_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib