Re: [Bridge-mib] Draft-ietf-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2 Issues Resolution

John Flick <john.flick@hp.com> Wed, 12 January 2005 00:43 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA21110; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:43:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CoWq3-0005uw-Ag; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:58:20 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CoWQt-0004nc-Ca; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:32:19 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CoWGF-0002Bv-EN for bridge-mib@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:21:19 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA19783 for <bridge-mib@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:21:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CoWU9-0005PA-4i for bridge-mib@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:35:42 -0500
Received: from rosemail.rose.hp.com (rosemail.rose.hp.com [15.43.209.160]) by palrel12.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C09406BE8; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ros54018lap.americas.hpqcorp.net [15.255.5.21]) by rosemail.rose.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7107FFF; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <41E46C1C.9010104@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:15:24 -0800
From: John Flick <john.flick@hp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
Subject: Re: [Bridge-mib] Draft-ietf-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2 Issues Resolution
References: <20050106223936.GC24475@james> <20050111211734.CD74ED5EE@hermes.iu-bremen.de> <20050111223303.GB6090@james>
In-Reply-To: <20050111223303.GB6090@james>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bridge-mib@ietf.org, "'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
X-BeenThere: bridge-mib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: bridge-mib.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:bridge-mib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib>, <mailto:bridge-mib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: bridge-mib-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The PortID used to identify a port in STP (or RSTP or MSTP...) is
16 bits.  Of that, the upper four bits is used for port priority,
and the lower 12 bits are used for the port number, which
effectively limits you to 4k ports per bridge. (This was where the
changes to port priority came from in .1t.  Originally the port
priority and port number were 8 bits each, which limited you to
256 ports per bridge.)  512 bytes can hold a bitmask representing
4k ports.

John

Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:17:28PM -0500, David B Harrington wrote:
> 
> 
>>3) the range has been constrained in the revision. This is probably
>>not a problem, but it is a semantic change.
> 
> 
> Does someone recall where the introduced size limit for ...AllowedToGoTo
> object comes from?  The port index is restricted to 65535 and from that
> perspective the upper boundary would be 8K and not 512 bytes (which 
> is equivalent to a maximum of 4096 ports). Can some IEEE 802.1 expert
> please explain this?
> 
> /js
> 


_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
Bridge-mib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib