Re: [btns] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5386 (7829)

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Thu, 29 February 2024 00:24 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240229000539.C551019759CC@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:23:34 -0800
Cc: btns@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D295904F-237A-40B3-A652-7BA4813673C8@amsl.com>
References: <20240229000539.C551019759CC@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Nicolas.Williams@sun.com, mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, julienl@qualcomm.com, lha@stacken.kth.se
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/btns/2E4nW9FbYHICcRqFRNSaKT_UKbo>
Subject: Re: [btns] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5386 (7829)
Precedence: list

FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. 

This looks like an attempt to duplicate errata report 1608 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid1608), which contains the same Corrected Text. 

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv


> On Feb 28, 2024, at 4:05 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5386,
> "Better-Than-Nothing Security: An Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7829
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Mccoy stevens <mccoystevens7777@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: Global
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Null
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Any peer that uses an IKEv2 AUTH method involving a digital
>      signature (made with a private key to a public key cryptosystem)
>      may match a BTNS PAD entry, provided that it matches no non-BTNS
>      PAD entries.  Suitable AUTH methods as of August 2007 are: RSA
> |     Digital Signature (method #1) and DSA Digital Signature (method
>      #3); see [RFC4306], Section 3.8.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> H
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5386 (draft-ietf-btns-core-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Better-Than-Nothing Security: An Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec
> Publication Date    : November 2008
> Author(s)           : N. Williams, M. Richardson
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Better-Than-Nothing Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[btns] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5386 (7829) RFC Errata System
Re: [btns] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5386 (7… Rebecca VanRheenen