Re: [btns] IETF75

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> Wed, 24 June 2009 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@marajade.sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1E228C500 for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.354
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aDbsYIQypihJ for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36AE28C4F5 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (unknown [206.191.15.98]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3CE3422E; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6143C4E81F; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:03:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
To: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090624134053.GS23524@leitl.org>
References: <002501c9f473$db257010$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <7ad6d6db0906240615p7f0c3926oa0a8935a9c1427c8@mail.gmail.com> <20090624134053.GS23524@leitl.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.1; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 21)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:03:33 -0400
Message-ID: <23541.1245870213@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@marajade.sandelman.ca
Cc: btns@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [btns] IETF75
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:05:01 -0000

>>>>> "Eugen" == Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> writes:
    Eugen> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:15:59PM +0200, Julien Laganier
    Eugen> wrote:

    >> We're currently progressing connexion latching thru IESG.
    >> 
    >> What remains to be done for the WG is to complete the API work
    >> item.  Since those haven't been discussed much on the mailing
    >> list we felt that a meeting wouldn't be productive.

    Eugen> How far is the proposed standard from being able to hit the
    Eugen> road?  I realize "it's done when it's done" but are we
    Eugen> looking at months, years, half a decade until there's a first
    Eugen> implementation available to beta testers?

  Read the document and comment.
  The API documents are stuck for lack of contributions.

-- 
]     Y'avait une poule de jammé dans l'muffler!!!!!!!!!        |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
]    h("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking,    ruby  guy");  [