Re: [btns] IETF75

Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> Wed, 24 June 2009 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <eugen@leitl.org>
X-Original-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E813A6814 for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nGnS0gFaEnpG for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from v64.ativel.com (v64.ativel.com [85.10.225.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5323428C105 for <btns@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by v64.ativel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08DA01578BB9; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:40:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:40:53 +0200
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
To: btns@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20090624134053.GS23524@leitl.org>
References: <002501c9f473$db257010$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <7ad6d6db0906240615p7f0c3926oa0a8935a9c1427c8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7ad6d6db0906240615p7f0c3926oa0a8935a9c1427c8@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: Re: [btns] IETF75
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list <btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>, <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:04:38 -0000

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:15:59PM +0200, Julien Laganier wrote:

> We're currently progressing connexion latching thru IESG.
> 
> What remains to be done for the WG is to complete the API work item.
> Since those haven't been discussed much on the mailing list we felt
> that a meeting wouldn't be productive.

How far is the proposed standard from being able to hit the road?
I realize "it's done when it's done" but are we looking at months,
years, half a decade until there's a first implementation available
to beta testers?

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE