IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C310] *[AD - Alvaro Retana] Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 9009 <draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 31 March 2021 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602C6F407DC; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -94.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=0.01, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=2, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O-ADYvVg2YaC; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06D49F407D2; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id y6so23580266eds.1; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uxBm/E0DnVYFQlLUo+/xqYx7Iav8w0Dmue+72gFk4H0=; b=nkAAGIUcX8CnOunWWxAdQiezjb207ZNWa0Q0ACVEJz31AZmq+T7hhDD66x6WrTKS43 svzIZcMtPrzLglQNiRaI6ROF+30Afcx4TfA0GNh2mwfYEN7vvhi/ULYig1k26sP7QJer nLnrx1R9LYX6wlNXiF2XlrwXohqrevW584uRLe6CT3ejPfd/PubnaQ3Qityw+A6XQdOn TMPHTok2NkrXGmqw/ztLTVRLgKGvEzxqQdBIrZHrJSalmj7ywr6sUE7rNKBV+4gWICHY c24dPb7AZDVabjjaLPiV5z/ns++RaKXTGIcOIeyn57oXiIpcwTlylcfEnXTSXfxftXZb qqPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uxBm/E0DnVYFQlLUo+/xqYx7Iav8w0Dmue+72gFk4H0=; b=j6h/4ZxgDsJLMBosFUv/NdJm5FpZoRn6uWTUGC081Yg0Qc4pmdO3Kp/eqCFXjrduD0 dI7johUzhrFrSTxMDCdK4aWGk8/aH0g5naBAoBGInjUnMnW+cSSiExJ7aeC/Zi5R/Jql eto+YtQMjdKPBXFwkpgcsrPy7inkMLhO4Qn94zJrUlbHfpCk0Z6WIRtIcIc6Mpx9ZZ9Q o4I5OdwJxExjYEQbHXxHd4luLfc1+cVrX/w0HuX80bbocGfXacEfYvVnNSz7VHcVPlC6 9W1vHyEmotniqBCSjuPFm5OUlROzYmAtsh7vQWsQLLGdcC6jUF08d2K9Ohpzj3Qp8hqp FZ1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532E2+nrfHeYqAJGwVPNyHC7Db1Q2u10Kbzb5Lp6oldX8C2yw/Ei My4Yru1F22siaoiXHTzvKlSjFCne9co+UyDsajw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzE2BUKQupnRa+z7N4hfQZXDTgFionjL+6Ep1bsddmmPyLPU0Xger5hogloX4Mwr/fdDVvWos5JjSvtiqH06kA=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cc94:: with SMTP id p20mr5638154edt.353.1617217675348; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:07:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:07:54 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A74BE7ED-5511-4DAD-90D7-67FE44E5259D@cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESswypWcjcr-YpmKN62uSznrCc4qcc9o0VKQsvWesBKqKrA@mail.gmail.com> <A74BE7ED-5511-4DAD-90D7-67FE44E5259D@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:07:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESszv1kU7_uPXckKbwwWGGCTioC15yz0skUxs=j58peUo8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: dominique barthel <dominique.barthel@orange.com>, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>, Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, peter van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>, "c310@rfc-editor.org" <c310@rfc-editor.org>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>, rabi narayan sahoo <rabinarayans0828@gmail.com>, Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000104edf05bed9d5fe"
Subject: Re: [C310] *[AD - Alvaro Retana] Re: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 9009 <draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-18.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:08:04 -0000

Ah, yes.  Then the original text is ok with me. :-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On March 31, 2021 at 1:05:42 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) (
pthubert@cisco.com) wrote:

Hello Lynne


> Le 31 mars 2021 à 00:04, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On March 30, 2021 at 5:44:32 PM, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
>
>> * Alvaro, please review the latest round of updates, and let us know if
you
>> approve. These updates include some additional "RFC 2119" terminology
("MUST
>> NOT"s in Section 4.3.3).
>
> Hi!
>
> The updates in 4.3.3 are ok...except for the part that says "MUST NOT
> remove its newer routing state". I know what the intent is, but the
> use of "newer" here sounds confusing to me. I think that simply
> saying "MUST NOT remove its (current) routing state" is clearer.
> Pascal??

Hello Alvaro

´newer’ is RFC6550 terminology to indicate a result of the special lollipop
comparison in section 7.2.

If it is clear that the current is newer from the previous sentence then
I’m good with your proposal.

Many thanks !

Pascal
>
> Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email