Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Wed, 12 May 2021 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BD7F407C6; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -197.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-197.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dCJErl14BDDZ; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4ABCF407BF; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E388638A05A; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9qbwSiXM52p; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AMSs-MBP.localdomain (unknown [47.186.1.92]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 623B838A059; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, jonathan.simon@analog.com, pister@eecs.berkeley.edu, ek.ietf@gmail.com, 6tisch-ads@ietf.org, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, c310@rfc-editor.org
References: <20210511062119.002BEF407AA@rfc-editor.org> <A94F0C78-2E71-45CB-9217-7E9F9B1F37B2@inria.fr> <c01e7b24-43f8-7bbe-acce-2a3ab36dab1f@amsl.com> <16711.1620836053@localhost> <2484e7a2-b4b7-b568-2758-f65269b6521f@amsl.com> <38780CBC-1554-4026-B612-CFA119D85B0A@inria.fr>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
Message-ID: <a61e786a-4801-58ee-9de9-29237208aafb@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 14:37:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <38780CBC-1554-4026-B612-CFA119D85B0A@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 19:37:21 -0000

Mališa,

Thanks for catching those! We have updated the document based on your 
feedback:

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-lastrfcdiff.html

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.txt
    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.pdf
    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.html
    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.xml
    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-diff.html
    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-auth48diff.html

Best regards,

RFC Editor/jm

On 5/12/21 12:21 PM, Mališa Vučinić wrote:
> Jean,
>
> Could you do the following small changes before my final approval. Right now, the table of contents shows:
> - Link-layer Configuration (note the lowercase "l" in "layer")
> - Network-Layer Configuration (note the uppercase "L" in "Layer")
> - Application-Level Configuration (note the use of "Level")
>
> I propose that we use the "*-Layer" form for all three cases.
>
> On a similar note, I propose to replace the following two occurrences of "level" with "layer" in the text:
> Section 8.3.1: "relates to the application-level handling"
> Section 8.4.2, Table 5: "Identifies the array carrying one or more link-level cryptographic keys"
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mališa
>
> On 12/05/2021 18:55, "Jean Mahoney" <jmahoney@amsl.com> wrote:
>
>      Michael,
>      
>      Thank you for your response. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48
>      status page:
>      
>          https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9031
>      
>      We'll await further word from Mališa regarding other AUTH48 changes
>      and/or approval.
>      
>      Best regards,
>      
>      RFC Editor/jm
>      
>      On 5/12/21 11:14 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>      > Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> wrote:
>      >      > Thank you for your quick response. We have updated the document with
>      >      > your feedback:
>      >
>      >      >    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.txt
>      >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.pdf
>      >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.html
>      >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.xml
>      >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-diff.html (all changes)
>      >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-auth48diff.html (AUTH48
>      >      > changes)
>      >
>      >      > We have also updated the terms "layer-2" and "layer-3" to "Layer 2" and
>      >      > "Layer 3" to match changes in RFC 9030.
>      >
>      > I have been through the changes, and I approve of them all.
>      > Thank you.
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > --
>      > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>      >             Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>