Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> Wed, 12 May 2021 19:37 UTC
Return-Path: <jmahoney@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c310@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BD7F407C6; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -197.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-197.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dCJErl14BDDZ; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4ABCF407BF; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E388638A05A; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9qbwSiXM52p; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AMSs-MBP.localdomain (unknown [47.186.1.92]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 623B838A059; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, jonathan.simon@analog.com, pister@eecs.berkeley.edu, ek.ietf@gmail.com, 6tisch-ads@ietf.org, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, c310@rfc-editor.org
References: <20210511062119.002BEF407AA@rfc-editor.org> <A94F0C78-2E71-45CB-9217-7E9F9B1F37B2@inria.fr> <c01e7b24-43f8-7bbe-acce-2a3ab36dab1f@amsl.com> <16711.1620836053@localhost> <2484e7a2-b4b7-b568-2758-f65269b6521f@amsl.com> <38780CBC-1554-4026-B612-CFA119D85B0A@inria.fr>
From: Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com>
Message-ID: <a61e786a-4801-58ee-9de9-29237208aafb@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 14:37:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <38780CBC-1554-4026-B612-CFA119D85B0A@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c310@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c310.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c310/>
List-Post: <mailto:c310@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c310>, <mailto:c310-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 19:37:21 -0000
Mališa, Thanks for catching those! We have updated the document based on your feedback: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-lastrfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-auth48diff.html Best regards, RFC Editor/jm On 5/12/21 12:21 PM, Mališa Vučinić wrote: > Jean, > > Could you do the following small changes before my final approval. Right now, the table of contents shows: > - Link-layer Configuration (note the lowercase "l" in "layer") > - Network-Layer Configuration (note the uppercase "L" in "Layer") > - Application-Level Configuration (note the use of "Level") > > I propose that we use the "*-Layer" form for all three cases. > > On a similar note, I propose to replace the following two occurrences of "level" with "layer" in the text: > Section 8.3.1: "relates to the application-level handling" > Section 8.4.2, Table 5: "Identifies the array carrying one or more link-level cryptographic keys" > > Thanks! > > Mališa > > On 12/05/2021 18:55, "Jean Mahoney" <jmahoney@amsl.com> wrote: > > Michael, > > Thank you for your response. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 > status page: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9031 > > We'll await further word from Mališa regarding other AUTH48 changes > and/or approval. > > Best regards, > > RFC Editor/jm > > On 5/12/21 11:14 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Jean Mahoney <jmahoney@amsl.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for your quick response. We have updated the document with > > > your feedback: > > > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.txt > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.pdf > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.html > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031.xml > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-diff.html (all changes) > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9031-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 > > > changes) > > > > > We have also updated the terms "layer-2" and "layer-3" to "Layer 2" and > > > "Layer 3" to match changes in RFC 9030. > > > > I have been through the changes, and I approve of them all. > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > > > > >
- [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tisch-m… rfc-editor
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… rfc-editor
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Alice Russo
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Simon, Jonathan
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Kris Pister
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Erik Kline
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Jean Mahoney
- Re: [C310] AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ietf-6tis… Michael Richardson
- [C310] [IANA] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RFC 9031 <draft-ie… Jean Mahoney
- [C310] [IANA #1197193] [IANA] Re: AUTH48 [JM]: RF… Sabrina Tanamal via RT
- Re: [C310] [IANA #1197193] [IANA] Re: AUTH48 [JM]… Jean Mahoney