IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C430] AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 8999 <draft-ietf-quic-invariants-13.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> Tue, 18 May 2021 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41482F407BC for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 16:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -195.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-195.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MANGLED_MEDS=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4nHDSF2vdzcU for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 16:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A49F40795 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 16:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE70938A05A; Tue, 18 May 2021 16:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IcQyFJBGF25E; Tue, 18 May 2021 16:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:646:8b02:5030:8cf3:a562:cc3c:1055] (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8b02:5030:8cf3:a562:cc3c:1055]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDF8A38A054; Tue, 18 May 2021 16:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <e7c8d110-8994-48f9-a602-8e072f0dfa00@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:53:56 -0700
Cc: Martin Thomson via C430 <c430@rfc-editor.org>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E90AD469-7744-4186-AA12-58F9AE5355E7@amsl.com>
References: <20210427073132.C6853F40794@rfc-editor.org> <d30f385e-3241-4f59-b6b2-7e89c623224c@www.fastmail.com> <45075525-F0C5-4B3F-8F25-7C18E637EA7C@amsl.com> <16679D1C-1EFF-439C-83C9-DCE29037AC80@amsl.com> <e7c8d110-8994-48f9-a602-8e072f0dfa00@www.fastmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Subject: Re: [C430] AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 8999 <draft-ietf-quic-invariants-13.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c430@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c430.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c430/>
List-Post: <mailto:c430@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 23:54:00 -0000

Hi, Martin.

Regarding RFC 9001:  we had

   [QUIC-TLS] Thomson, M., Ed. and S. Turner, Ed., "Using Transport
              Layer Security (TLS) to Secure QUIC", RFC 9001,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9001, May 2021,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9001>.

We have updated the title to match RFC 9001.

We have also updated the RFC URLs.

The latest files are posted here:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999.xml
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999-diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999-rfcdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999-auth48diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999-lastdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999-lastrfcdiff.html

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999-xmldiff1.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc8999-xmldiff2.html

We will update the URLs in RFC 9000 shortly.

Thank you!

RFC Editor/lb


> On May 18, 2021, at 3:52 PM, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 03:22, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
>> * We see that the IANA Considerations section was removed.  We suggest 
>> restoring it, per guidance in Section 9.1 of RFC 8126 
>> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126).
> 
> I have read that request, but am not convinced that there is enough justification to include the extra text.
> 
>> * We see that the title of RFC 9001 as listed in the References section 
>> was changed in this document.  This introduces a title mismatch.  Would 
>> you like to revert this change, as was done in the References section 
>> in RFC 9000?
> 
> Oh, I thought that I had fixed the inconsistency.  This is what the source shows:
> 
> rfc8999.xml:            <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
> rfc9000.xml:            <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
> rfc9001.xml:    <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
> rfc9002.xml:            <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
> 
> Do you have something else?
> 
>> * Not a major point, but we suggest restoring the comma after 
>> "[QUIC-TLS]" here, per our style guidelines for compound sentences:
>> 
>>    * QUIC uses TLS [QUIC-TLS] and some TLS messages are visible on the 
>>      wire.
> 
> Sure.
> 
>> PS  Would you like us to update the RFC URLs (by explicitly setting "target" URLs in the XML file) in RFCs 8999 and 9000, per the latest RFC Editor updates to RFCs 9001 and 9002?
> 
> That would be fine for all documents.  Best to be consistent.  FWIW, I've been using the xml2rfc --rfc-base-url flag to set to something else (for me at least, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ provides a better user experience).
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email