IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C430] AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 8999 <draft-ietf-quic-invariants-13.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 18 May 2021 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CD7F4079F for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=0.01, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=2, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=EBGC1MBX; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=aoPODfXW
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgUdkBmZSLkl for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB1CF40798 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B146171F; Tue, 18 May 2021 18:52:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 May 2021 18:52:22 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=rSchm/Cbdv8x1xvzkoaaEjj3y7Wm GfiGjf0pLs04BY4=; b=EBGC1MBX2KcBUcfI1rKbj8K7mmV0VWgbfqI1K5zg+loM KPOodFFFhnxd5wFTZ27LVOxcpbYxbDv5iNu9Mco9BHxsKHXFBJM9BLNqP/ND/j0/ BtWwYS2+W9Hyse3S5RH3ZE2epJa1oDGg9un0Dq+fCNFC0CLkwtkAUf7SReuI8tqX MQ8qZiKzIJrK1mfBue3wnwUNXySM6ZWH2FuPMX9EyVpdVatBPad/pd5AerKRl4A8 LFenfLzhhIOOW2AHkl0tpEtBAEL9S+f6s4x3SuY/SNYGid3VuK/brwhoXosm1+Rr 85MGCewVyXLq7/1ZKmn2diLuwwRsn3JBHh6aZ8mSBw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=rSchm/ Cbdv8x1xvzkoaaEjj3y7WmGfiGjf0pLs04BY4=; b=aoPODfXWGEle39HRYeUQEE 0h1SkyqBgymefYGE6xEvzXTexcdOTx3Tlkh89Ku7K0VrpyLTjJEZf/IfeQQoLuDb jf6AktRQYbZNbWem+WRuAZ/+5MTmDlGiYx5HljHLCldncEQz9hbdRW0twjtq14/C hL0zCfKC721Z65TPPDHBQpj440u1l+THHk9uvimNoZF3x/39pDEj1CO5EDnIxCjA KV+GwN7pXZs+ST0cVhp663reJuOqKWnzTUvf9xbyu8DEZ977cQBo4GU/dda21G4T nQQRM8mpmh5xucf+GHwhYpA4Ebg952H/XOibjEobjlHSlgZ4Lvj2twYi+MeDFezw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JUWkYCbEThB8IZi86Xz8_g44aRAIix8z_AS-B3wvMFx1y6d_jbVLAw> <xme:JUWkYFbEwcRmJbAEowG_aNE9HYBNE--4N2CfURz5AAoobnfDKAS_jB0afLcZhpFvY HVHFNa-MCaY9GPN4Ro>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeikedguddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudetudetvdfgfeetudevffeljeejheduuddvjedttdejtdegffev heegheettddunecuffhomhgrihhnpehrfhgtqdgvughithhorhdrohhrghdpihgvthhfrd horhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep mhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JUWkYM80jmezs8hHWs442YSLQ4Lp8nr4wH5OZt0988gDsEcv8UMxpA> <xmx:JUWkYEritVDbmV7mVR7cpA8nS74EPrwusJON1CuX3HR_0qp6Af5GVQ> <xmx:JUWkYNqZO8s61KkxSayWBjSTSYF8zTUJI8Ef5OI6iprE0TwuIgrTeg> <xmx:JkWkYMR8WQdPXOQC1_xRdXuCq2iNU94mbiXG02NBbL3PNQyMbT2kzg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7B5F74E0129; Tue, 18 May 2021 18:52:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-448-gae190416c7-fm-20210505.004-gae190416
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <e7c8d110-8994-48f9-a602-8e072f0dfa00@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <16679D1C-1EFF-439C-83C9-DCE29037AC80@amsl.com>
References: <20210427073132.C6853F40794@rfc-editor.org> <d30f385e-3241-4f59-b6b2-7e89c623224c@www.fastmail.com> <45075525-F0C5-4B3F-8F25-7C18E637EA7C@amsl.com> <16679D1C-1EFF-439C-83C9-DCE29037AC80@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 08:52:01 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson via C430 <c430@rfc-editor.org>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [C430] AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 8999 <draft-ietf-quic-invariants-13.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: c430@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c430.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c430/>
List-Post: <mailto:c430@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:52:29 -0000

On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 03:22, Lynne Bartholomew wrote:
> * We see that the IANA Considerations section was removed.  We suggest 
> restoring it, per guidance in Section 9.1 of RFC 8126 
> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126).

I have read that request, but am not convinced that there is enough justification to include the extra text.
 
> * We see that the title of RFC 9001 as listed in the References section 
> was changed in this document.  This introduces a title mismatch.  Would 
> you like to revert this change, as was done in the References section 
> in RFC 9000?

Oh, I thought that I had fixed the inconsistency.  This is what the source shows:

rfc8999.xml:            <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
rfc9000.xml:            <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
rfc9001.xml:    <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>
rfc9002.xml:            <title>Using TLS to Secure QUIC</title>

Do you have something else?

> * Not a major point, but we suggest restoring the comma after 
> "[QUIC-TLS]" here, per our style guidelines for compound sentences:
> 
>     * QUIC uses TLS [QUIC-TLS] and some TLS messages are visible on the 
>       wire.

Sure.

> PS  Would you like us to update the RFC URLs (by explicitly setting "target" URLs in the XML file) in RFCs 8999 and 9000, per the latest RFC Editor updates to RFCs 9001 and 9002?

That would be fine for all documents.  Best to be consistent.  FWIW, I've been using the xml2rfc --rfc-base-url flag to set to something else (for me at least, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ provides a better user experience).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email