IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 18 May 2021 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6CF407A5 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=2, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=eGLnI66k; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=d0chmHYs
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M1qGAL3MZXKz for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25EADF4079A for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FF916FF for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 18:30:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 May 2021 18:30:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=hW3W1 CS5Mi9pQyVfnPMknz5j3+Mq/pOSW3ptb9dGZNA=; b=eGLnI66kvj1QgfsFA20S7 m39BOyI6mveCqtb3VKhby05FMjNXIPPak4bbNr6IDm9CbJC0q7ktM7v0fK29IpSU 1fhLhKl0A/M7vlKnvEYQYLZp7tfSEqMUhPrqY/CdiwWHfGpGyr1jaAKqlFO/2ois itH+XdQs0v12xjGaj5Nx/SLfrVZDRXcHVcO7rIOZHX8Zcek3YjeCvt1X8J5f5JfD Pdu5p8bggSXNGsRx+uQTbtfBvhJyu9DDe+GYzXVz2hI11h+Xz4Eu0O4ixfyyy/h+ o2/8a1p7II+K7vhJ7ctVYm9x9KHVWXXLKk3dC7qlRTesnMUfSWcsAeJsrHwb0YDj w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hW3W1CS5Mi9pQyVfnPMknz5j3+Mq/pOSW3ptb9dGZ NA=; b=d0chmHYsZHq5cAN7W6yT0sB4k63z2N1COR9sJb6XdteqqtSZ75wyAhBVt 1hK+ZfRH2NIo4ZYl8vclU5xnzvOmVKrayQkefCrH8v+U4ASrqyj3r9UTogggrv/p ORRz3Anj8cMFMYriOB1iyV1scRboltIa6NDTLLFEf2lJt8A1tJWvmKiuNzGSyH0q eqrNqo4usSXXllrnRxeSG0WLMI2qmyv4EBPlLqxntTEp4kkSYeFIIDCBnekqJp2U 6ghCFqotVnSGr8ce5hmQ7fGbwQbJ1lnQH6SYhULz1gazLhP+XZhitYilph+Mm0iZ dBqvFEDAOfHPxKKur2vLtWkfPwCpw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:5z-kYEZjX1_chTNAgeSt4-Vcpew0GqnNy_5QdJYuFlwrOXuZelOlyg> <xme:5z-kYPZETM8_0R_Pp93pj1GDsGFifdgINiWdOky77bb3Nv-QfRXqQikhnDK3bTLaV TKHaj-NrSICP7OWnlk>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeikedgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtgfesth hqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehl ohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfejueduieffledtge elheejvdettdejudduhefggeefgfekgfeuieetgefftddtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnh gvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:5z-kYO-4lqd3PN4nQpcK1t-9f7gg9AIgnRQqBkUJFbkPaCBk2wwT9Q> <xmx:5z-kYOrjishCf2DfUvLuAaqrGXpwC-7nwK-fQH4MZ2mKBs-z6VUlOg> <xmx:5z-kYPoK42_Y2PpuU6KlAt1oFZY108qI-_jNZfeYJExvQdBZeW8nvQ> <xmx:5z-kYM2wYuktRMUsQLfxR8NnYlU4dWLmg4DFbHE1YzScQpgXk39oWg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7B3EF4E0129; Tue, 18 May 2021 18:29:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-448-gae190416c7-fm-20210505.004-gae190416
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <6151fe4e-16ec-4585-b238-5bb3fcc5777a@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E148B19-298A-4476-9A6F-8EE93B8F71DA@amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1196209@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-1188362@icann.org> <161237263486.16375.16046346962390939039@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-2459-1613104363-271.1188362-37-0@icann.org> <7357872F-30B2-47F5-BCF4-958913894591@amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-12070-1619736994-745.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-27769-1621353382-424.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <6E148B19-298A-4476-9A6F-8EE93B8F71DA@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 08:29:39 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Martin Thomson via C430 <c430@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)
X-BeenThere: c430@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c430.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c430/>
List-Post: <mailto:c430@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:30:06 -0000

Hi Sandy,  Thanks for going through this so thoroughly.

On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 05:37, Sandy Ginoza via C430 wrote:
> Hi Amanda, Martin,
> 
> > On May 18, 2021, at 8:56 AM, Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Sandy,
> > 
> > Do the authors prefer to not include 0x1XX in the registry? I believe we would at least need a note, if not an entry. It's not clear to me whether this is a kind of reservation or a description of what can be registered.
> 
> Sorry for not closing this out; thanks for the followup.  I’m including 
> Martin (via the c430 list) on the thread.
> 
> Martin, please verify that the XXX in Section 19.8 is intentional. 
> 
>    STREAM frames implicitly create a stream and carry stream data. The 
>    Type field in the STREAM frame takes the form 0b00001XXX (or the 
>    set of values from 0x08 to 0x0f).

Yeah, I don't *like* this, but in this case it is important that we mark out the individual bits.  (The registry can use 0x08-0x0f as described.)

One thing here; in the registry this is 0x08-0x0F (uppercase), which is not consistent with the other entries.

(As for the other actions, item (2) was done.  Item (3) (CRYPTO_ERROR) needs to be added.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email