IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)

Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> Wed, 26 May 2021 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F832F407B1 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -198.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-198.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bxtH88lPbI8X for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13491F407B0 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1924E389FB3 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P41H7X08HSXE for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:646:8b02:5030:b56b:9679:20a8:b92b] (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8b02:5030:b56b:9679:20a8:b92b]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01982389FB1 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 17:28:57 -0700
References: <RT-Ticket-1196209@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-1188362@icann.org> <161237263486.16375.16046346962390939039@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-2459-1613104363-271.1188362-37-0@icann.org> <7357872F-30B2-47F5-BCF4-958913894591@amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-12070-1619736994-745.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-27769-1621353382-424.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <6E148B19-298A-4476-9A6F-8EE93B8F71DA@amsl.com> <6151fe4e-16ec-4585-b238-5bb3fcc5777a@www.fastmail.com> <3F942BA8-F4DB-4272-91BF-6013145818FE@amsl.com> <ef768958-63b8-4ea8-a61f-e579c461661a@www.fastmail.com> <7291f943-51de-456c-b8c6-a453c494725b@www.fastmail.com> <CAEE489E-9C98-4B60-AA45-30FB5DCE0F0B@amsl.com> <9074BE20-FD2A-4C36-99A6-F557F3DFABC6@amsl.com> <4cfba816-3cf8-4619-bf7c-ec8f555910b9@www.fastmail.com> <12AF4BBD-E681-4752-8AB8-53F65D349979@amsl.com> <CACpbDccjpjvdYSjVeVvWrCzP0EftUAy=QhTasA0Em9O30fKXBg@mail.gmail.com> <0C2956E1-E146-4655-8340-449CCAA45D0D@amsl.com> <70F34AC9-C14B-4A4E-9F11-22CC46CC4E32@amsl.com> <53beb18c-e6bb-4292-9dd7-2e1caa7901e0@www.fastmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson via C430 <c430@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <53beb18c-e6bb-4292-9dd7-2e1caa7901e0@www.fastmail.com>
Message-Id: <AAE92C4B-E4DB-4B77-B6D9-94EEDA89ECBF@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Subject: Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)
X-BeenThere: c430@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c430.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c430/>
List-Post: <mailto:c430@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 00:28:51 -0000

Hi, Martin.  Thanks for the quick reply!  And no apology needed -- the issue was on our end.

We'll wait to hear from Jana before making any updates and moving forward.

Thanks again!

RFC Editor/lb

> On May 25, 2021, at 5:07 PM, Martin Thomson via C430 <c430@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Lynne,
> 
> Sorry for missing that.
> 
> On Wed, May 26, 2021, at 09:48, Lynne Bartholomew via C430 wrote:
>> Hi, Martin and Jana.
>> 
>> We are preparing this document for publication.
>> 
>> Apologies, but one of our questions from earlier in the process fell 
>> through the cracks:
>> 
>> ECN count / ECN Count (in text, e.g., "3 ECN counts", "three ECN
>>   Counts")
>> 
>> This document has 22 instances of "ECN count", appearing between 
>> Section 7 and Appendix A.4.  There are three instances of "ECN Count" 
>> in text that we suggest changing to "ECN count":
> 
> I agree that this is the right answer (consistent with others we've made).
> 
>> 1.  At the end of Section 19.3:  ... The three ECN Counts; ...
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> 2.  In Section 19.3.2:  ... ECN Counts are only present ...
> 
> Instead:
> The ECN Counts field is only present ...
> 
>> 3.  Just after Figure 27:  The three ECN Counts are: ...
> 
> Instead:
> The three fields in ECN Counts are: ...
> 
> I should get Jana to check my work though.
> -- 
> C430 mailing list
> C430@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email