Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 19 May 2021 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: c430@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9342AF407B4 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 17:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=2, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST=-100, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=h5bcrbdN; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=FsZYJi9c
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KwmEupN97lQ4 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 17:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45F57F407A6 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 17:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322D91761 for <c430@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 20:17:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 May 2021 20:17:02 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=NL6qKQwSbRWx+zy0wTWelr3HOcCE9GD APbLChn9VAOk=; b=h5bcrbdNYHK9JO25DOJTPl0UfeY2a90EsCzgdZQr2BRU0xS QuoWpqfeWlzL819eKwArYL2A/wdjYeewZAgDzNhjpLGMpFLTor7g9wArY9UlCMQX QeV9gF9Ed0IAlny9w3xt5OfBaM8aCF1vGE73oZ4Ns0+WNqsPjnPVS4xRG4rco7lB n+vcIZYiqdPt9wohu7x5hxQH9scXRzOFPh9oNUjO7aexHCfuz+w79iKGChZ5lojo 9lV84L8p4Bbqp4oY1ab9iE8IEMi0GL6tZhylD4oz8CVcVgH0o37ITWdLw9CtETeB aWY7GRshIouzNWSAmAr1VFNbCEzyxLrUIU+5Asw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=NL6qKQ wSbRWx+zy0wTWelr3HOcCE9GDAPbLChn9VAOk=; b=FsZYJi9csRjxHXEYmBjUzd 1SeVzUqH1tdMD+mOv5Q6i2q+DELbM8kMiddIfjCGpJ2o3+NtraqPj+uAdeMWR60c mg2bHfQg0In16imSaC1KmpwSOQx5k8qa9kECYsFA0kH7TPN9o1iANeX3xcFsXgS3 T+J8sr4/cPRDlCLUAdJX5aEO6cXkV9int5Tm/IgU1Fz8hOB+6/MMfxa3wq59v0/e iklCMj9EjwqYXquILTirEXCayKChuoSGMRtim4P0Bt//hKakqBKJydnMMzUO7To8 q80zq9i1NhVGwLSCQiNiscjWD6nelBzL9/Nl4Lgy3RhR7HRYQxGDw6Gss7bEyidA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_FikYM-QDzmEZb3-wXxHtFOy3G45ndY-V22P3nBCwAQ8cRZ75PKcMg> <xme:_FikYEu-hJC38lfG6OA9EtYqkAu2kRywOl-ldSuuENGKHhqqsADUWcAV8FtxlqcMG VOG7rbYJ4adbdY8n9M>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeikedgvdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffledugeeluedujeelve dvjeefjefgiedtgfeihefhveevuddtleffvdeuvdffveenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhf rdhorhhgpdifvghllhdrsghrpdhrfhgtqdgvughithhorhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhho phihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_FikYCDAADr1gFjO0_wu2kJ_y093prBg4VIdb4bmMdIZI2NnlDhsMA> <xmx:_FikYMf5UYG4UJsgR3mIVzhiLvx0NGRB7UJfEAtHeIK-qyH9zjn6AA> <xmx:_FikYBPoB8hq2SEOrU3Tt2j8tLycEcI0HbHhccBXTcvfIlyoqg3vQw> <xmx:_VikYHamLREEFbtellGNHlk1GkXar8NNw447XRYSlSb2qvVTd0QVLA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 972544E0129; Tue, 18 May 2021 20:17:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-448-gae190416c7-fm-20210505.004-gae190416
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <7291f943-51de-456c-b8c6-a453c494725b@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ef768958-63b8-4ea8-a61f-e579c461661a@www.fastmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1196209@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-1188362@icann.org> <161237263486.16375.16046346962390939039@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-2459-1613104363-271.1188362-37-0@icann.org> <7357872F-30B2-47F5-BCF4-958913894591@amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-12070-1619736994-745.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-27769-1621353382-424.1196209-37-0@icann.org> <6E148B19-298A-4476-9A6F-8EE93B8F71DA@amsl.com> <6151fe4e-16ec-4585-b238-5bb3fcc5777a@www.fastmail.com> <3F942BA8-F4DB-4272-91BF-6013145818FE@amsl.com> <ef768958-63b8-4ea8-a61f-e579c461661a@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 10:16:40 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Martin Thomson via C430 <c430@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [C430] RFC 9000 - Re: [IANA #1196209] Protocol Action: 'QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-quic-transport-34.txt)
X-BeenThere: c430@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <c430.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/c430/>
List-Post: <mailto:c430@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430>, <mailto:c430-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 00:17:06 -0000

FWIW, I can put the change into source, but it runs into https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/548 (it isn't kramdown); so we won't be able to reproduce this on our end.

On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 10:12, Martin Thomson via C430 wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 09:37, Lynne Bartholomew via C430 wrote:
> > Hi, Martin.
> > 
> > Apologies for the oversight previously -- we think that in line with 
> > updates to Table 3 and the entry in Section 20.1 for CRYPTO_ERROR, the 
> > spaces around the "-" in the CRYPTO_ERROR row in Table 7 should be 
> > removed.
> 
> Yeah, I wanted to do that, but I didn't want to break the table and had 
> no means to do zero-width spaces (kramdown doesn't support that as far 
> as I'm aware).
> 
> If you can add the zero-width space, that would be OK.  The output 
> looks fine.  (I'll try to wrestle the character into our source as 
> well.)
> 
> <br/> seems like the wrong solution here.
> 
> Cheers,
> Martin
> -- 
> C430 mailing list
> C430@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/c430
>