IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [calsify] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8984 (6872)

Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 08 March 2022 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82163A0D8D for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 20:19:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=YlgKKciA; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dleNtXGd
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqVKEGxn2Vpe for <calsify@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 20:19:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ECCA3A0D7E for <calsify@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 20:19:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9FA3200973; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 23:19:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Mar 2022 23:19:00 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=4h94HAzjsaaWVo 9TWShPwsVJadICjPNogzZee2fPdv0=; b=YlgKKciAyC4p6MznES/pCLHKhY1CYN 8JERHoUiBQgb5KNclW6OaFS2vR09DZd4laZgpvHkvBkhDBGFj01k8SA0myJltjIc xD1QLODFIXOm2yCjaGeskRZ4abyFOXBxbw6xPrtxOGp1VOB/3Ne20EG8Mgfm+Pju 2dgYsAshoUSm4QdrFB3qWJCRfcZxoHf8VYL5DYrTLOsU4/EEYxzLo/3LUhjoD2/M GOg+LCRkBnVEEvicieJrmqclxbD0H0UQyG5sYH8BU7llYW9uWWOWav1GcoK1yJwF 6eC6Vf7EhNweFDEg5Il5gczHrAda81BcYw1qn7Jbzy3XxW2JMTDWKgWA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=4h94HAzjsaaWVo9TW ShPwsVJadICjPNogzZee2fPdv0=; b=dleNtXGdsmIJhUaSvNkdYFGOkho1NZY1d 1jq7JqC50Wtna07EVrngE5uRpEG873moLEykB72Kl3FXwjd4mhAeGr980zQI9qrf a8QmXPMXEWjZWZ4HCHnqpFMrruH5zdR0wzwlsPi4cZkDHscjMHG8esVyuEUD//Zi LhpywtPbj5FnPD+/3oMsMxYBlMaIpTGOZZm1ncJlIbHznC1ZtKUUvqlWEF3jb9LN F0lfsUgL7yOS6rcfF565dhrz70j6J1oyOvSgJSShSpXFQKrypmHaJR0gNmhHxnI/ vIinMLAgvbNKVXnWQI2wofpcXAZ5f3TTHVB13rlyIqNnfci8JQcwA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:M9kmYvRuFAlNJG2h-CEGIeCUJMyIz4i4QUggNmPzLyDWIL0d4DNTRg> <xme:M9kmYgySSGLdYHO8UqbFe9nQ72ddwOilSKN7AiBmmGnTC4nbVLd_3_Dl1lujR4nnV w8RVXhdaQxM3g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudduhedgieejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfpvghi lhculfgvnhhkihhnshdfuceonhgvihhljhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevvdetvdduleekhfeghfetfeettdelhfehfeevffevleek uddtudffieevjeevhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:M9kmYk1PjQ7jVRgcm4xAGbhEqZ2uXyGGqQnOWdmj3dR0bA48qldPbQ> <xmx:M9kmYvBdSU28vH3QxsAsIwYrny_j6XwEgheWBFKNUaKNnnhykxGiNg> <xmx:M9kmYohjJsjSJAPQ1b95kg_amQfYvFkbQe-xZx6fADOb2lWzSGvfMg> <xmx:M9kmYgctVaKmLJ-LBcULqf-RLPBEgrCnnxporoxxrtAEyxQJwlp5Pw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7E41EAC0E98; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 23:18:59 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-4869-g350fa62b48-fm-20220307.001-g350fa62b
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a6e33707-6f9f-4096-bf3f-a04aaf398e5b@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220307163210.73B6AE52D9@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20220307163210.73B6AE52D9@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:18:27 +1100
From: Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
To: rfc-editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Robert Stepanek <rsto@fastmailteam.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Cc: calsify@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16d898a448ae4a8bb635fd7e828b7e70"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/3D74cjshsPifRMlGIoecNrjmPuM>
Subject: Re: [calsify] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8984 (6872)
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 04:19:06 -0000

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, at 3:32 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> Adds the recurrenceRules and excludedRecurrenceRules properties to the list of allowed properties of private events.
> 
> Only the combination of recurrence rules, excluded recurrence rules and recurrence overrides allows to generate the full recurrence set for this event.
> 
> Omitting the properties was an oversight during the initial publication of this RFC.

I agree with this. Robert, I think we need to explicitly state *excluded* as an allowed property too though to make it clear that this should still be included in recurrenceOverrides?

Cheers,
Neil.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email