[Ietf-calsify] What's the status of xCal?
cmtalbert at gmail.com (Clint Talbert) Mon, 15 January 2007 08:00 UTC
From: "cmtalbert at gmail.com"
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:00:27 +0000
Subject: [Ietf-calsify] What's the status of xCal?
In-Reply-To: <20070112231430.BBC89142264@laweleka.osafoundation.org>
References: <20070112231430.BBC89142264@laweleka.osafoundation.org>
Message-ID: <45ABA4D7.2010108@gmail.com>
X-Date: Mon Jan 15 08:00:27 2007
Hi Tim, I would also be interested in this draft and the stylesheet to transform iCalendar to XML. Thanks, Clint Talbert Tim Hare wrote: > I haven't updated by draft lately on guidelines for using XML with calendar > information, but I still have the latest draft if you want it. It wasn't > xcalendar per se but had a lot of stuff from the original draft; also had > some stylesheet examples (which you probably don't need). I also have in > final stages of development a stylesheet to take a string containing an > iCalendar file and transform it into XML. > > > Tim Hare > Interested Bystander, Non-Inc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org > [mailto:ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org] On Behalf Of Reinhold > Kainhofer > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:28 AM > To: CALSIFY Mailinglist > Subject: [Ietf-calsify] What's the status of xCal? > > Hi, > I'm currently implementing an export function in KOrganizer that uses XSLT > transformations to create easier output in several formats and even allows > XSL-FO to be used for printing. For this, I need an intermediary XML format, > and xCalendar comes in quite handy here. > > However, I could only find expired drafts on the net (with various different > namespace URIs used, so I'm not sure which is the current one). So what's > the status of xCal? > I found the draft > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-royer-calsch-xcal-03 > using "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xcal", but not using the namespace prefix > consistently, so most of the elements are NOT in that namespace :-( (Older > drafts use the namespace "http://ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt", and they employ > the xCal: prefix consistently). > I also found the older calsch-many, but that's obviously a deprecated draft. > > > Of course, once I have implemented several xsl stylesheets (maybe even to > xsl-fo for printing/exporting a calendar to PDF in various layouts), these > transformations won't be restricted to KOrganizer, but can be used with any > xCalendar file produced by any application that is able to export to > xCalendar (which are not many currently...). > > So is there any decision on the XML representation of iCal? Or is this dead > and I need to come up with my own XML and other applications won't be able > to use my stylesheets, because we don't have a standardized XML > representation, only self-cooked ones? > > Thanks, > Reinhold > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria > email: reinhold@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ > * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, > http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/ > * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer > * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/ > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-calsify mailing list > Ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-calsify mailing list > Ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify > >
- [Ietf-calsify] What's the status of xCal? Reinhold Kainhofer
- [Ietf-calsify] What's the status of xCal? Clint Talbert
- [Ietf-calsify] What's the status of xCal? Reinhold Kainhofer