[calsify] [Errata Verified] RFC5545 (6109)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 16 January 2024 15:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49054C14CE4B; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:00:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VwWU9Szgsp0z; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2664C47A8F7; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id A7B5E1BA3D9F; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:32:45 -0800 (PST)
To: LarsHenriksen@get2net.dk, bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, calsify@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240116143245.A7B5E1BA3D9F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:32:45 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/iAMtI4rzuJMwojg_nn3zijXECjs>
Subject: [calsify] [Errata Verified] RFC5545 (6109)
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:00:34 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5545, "Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6109 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Lars Henriksen <LarsHenriksen@get2net.dk> Date Reported: 2020-04-19 Verified by: Francesca Palombini (IESG) Section: 3.6.1 Original Text ------------- The anniversary type of "VEVENT" can span more than one date (i.e., "DTEND" property value is set to a calendar date after the "DTSTART" property value). Corrected Text -------------- The anniversary type of "VEVENT" can span more than one date (i.e., "DTEND" property value is set to a calendar date at least two days after the "DTSTART" property value). Notes ----- "DTEND" comes, by definition (3.8.2.2), always after "DTSTART". The span (duration) is the difference between the two. -------------------------------------- RFC5545 (draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar) Publication Date : September 2009 Author(s) : B. Desruisseaux, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [calsify] [Errata Verified] RFC5545 (6109) RFC Errata System