[calsify] [Errata Verified] RFC5545 (7332)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 16 January 2024 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: calsify@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D58C090388; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:01:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id em4q_ZV1ynYh; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:01:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528C3C032102; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:34:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 433741BA3D9F; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:34:14 -0800 (PST)
To: tobias@lyckligtax.com, bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, calsify@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240116143414.433741BA3D9F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:34:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/qNSoEYiE8AhnEdgke5mF7R1kxfw>
Subject: [calsify] [Errata Verified] RFC5545 (7332)
X-BeenThere: calsify@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification <calsify.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/calsify/>
List-Post: <mailto:calsify@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/calsify>, <mailto:calsify-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:01:20 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC5545,
"Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7332

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Tobias Subklewe <tobias@lyckligtax.com>
Date Reported: 2023-02-04
Verified by: Francesca Palombini (IESG)

Section: 3.3.9

Original Text
-------------
The period start at 18:00:00 on January 1, 1997 and lasting 5
hours and 30 minutes would be:

19970101T180000Z/PT5H30M

Corrected Text
--------------
The period start at 18:00:00 on January 1, 1997 and lasting 5
hours and 30 minutes would be:

19970101T180000/PT5H30M

Notes
-----
I do not know if this is an editorial or technical issue.

If I understand the datetime value (Section 3.3.5) correct the last character should only be "Z" if the value is in UTC.

In the first example in section 3.3.9 UTC is explicitely mentioned but not in the second example.

--------------------------------------
RFC5545 (draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar)
Publication Date    : September 2009
Author(s)           : B. Desruisseaux, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG