Re: [calsify] WGLC JSCalendar

[Michael Douglass <[e-mail]>]

I'm implementing this so I may have more...

Section 6.3 - simple group -

Is that example correct? The definition of entries say's

A collection of group members.  This is represented as a map of the
"uid" property value to the JSCalendar object member having that uid.

but the example just looks like an array. Is it supposed to be

{
   "@type": "jsgroup",
   "uid": "2a358cee-6489-4f14-a57f-c104db4dc343",
   "updated": "2018-01-15T18:00:00Z",
   "name": "A simple group",
   "entries": {
     "2a358cee-6489-4f14-a57f-c104db4dc2f1": {
       "@type": "jsevent",
       "uid": "2a358cee-6489-4f14-a57f-c104db4dc2f1",
       "updated": "2018-01-15T18:00:00Z",
       "title": "Some event",
       "start": "2018-01-15T13:00:00",
       "timeZone": "America/New_York",
       "duration": "PT1H"
     },
     "2a358cee-6489-4f14-a57f-c104db4dc2f2": {
       "@type": "jstask",
       "uid": "2a358cee-6489-4f14-a57f-c104db4dc2f2",
       "updated": "2018-01-15T18:00:00Z",
       "title": "Do something"
     }
   }
}


On 10/23/19 23:38, Neil Jenkins wrote:
>> 8.3.2. Initial Contents for the JSCalendar Properties Registry
>> should be
>> 8.3.2. Initial Contents for the JSCalendar Types Registry
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
>>> and in section 8.2.6 categories shows up twice in the table. Was 
>>> that intended?
>>>
>> and also "status"
>>
>
> Yes, this is intentional. The property context is different between 
> them and they have different definitions.
>
> Cheers,
> Neil.